This leaked today from inside webmd, the most bullshit corpo HR video I think I’ve ever seen.

To break down the obvious ones:

  • Employees who are obviously either drinking wayyy too much company koolaid or who know that their jobs will end if they aren’t in this video
  • An extremely out of touch CEO who wants things back the old way without giving any concrete data proving that it’s better beyond conjecture
  • A company with “internet” in the name who literally doesn’t understand the concept of the internet
  • Threatening and bullying language to force people back in office.
  • and just a nice touch, the office is of course not near mass transit or anything and requires driving in
  • Did anyone notice they were all on green screen, kinda proving that there was no need for them to be in person?
    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup! If it’s that important, why doesn’t your company pay for everyone to drive to and from work (covering gas, car repairs, and allowing employees to clock in when they start their commute.)Also, pay for everyone’s lunch since they have to be there.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    in 2021 my job was “informing, not asking”. a bunch of us walked, and it crippled the OU. They actually shut it down not long ago, they decided to keep a skeleton crew on to keep the app running while the contracts run out, then they’re gonna sunset it

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      lmao gg. The absolute disrespect to even say “informing, not asking” unironically. Pretty sure these people see us as slaves at some level.

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Honestly, if they said only that part in a memo, it would still obviously be very bad but it would be so much better than embedding it within this video. If I were an employee watching this, when they reached the part where they play Iko Iko while people dance after the CEO delivered the ultimatum, I’d want to shoot myself in the fucking head.

  • Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    " Internet Brands did not respond to a request for comment, except to say that people were busy with meetings. "

    Lololololol

    Fuck them. It sounds like they’re too bust having meetings instead of getting work done.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    10 months ago

    This will definitely push all accounting, data entry and other such office workers to the heights of creativity and inventiveness - just what they need! /s

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If they get to stay home then why can’t I?!?

      That’s really it’s about.

      The only people that should be in the office are people who literally need to be there.

      Like if there are physical servers and they need to be physically configured then sure the tech can go in for that.

      If it’s a repair show, then sure the tech has to come in to do the repair.

      Otherwise let people stay home.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They do it because they invested in the property and want to make it worth their while. Now they can enforce some stupid productivity policies while you are there.

          • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re forgetting the part where they can shift the blame of the company is tanking as the fault of " lazy workers who won’t RTO" instead of their terrible management, to convince shareholders not to get rid of them

            • Mirshe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Or, “we’re raking in record profits but we need to make the line go SLIGHTLY more up for the shareholders, so we’re telling you to RTO in the hopes that enough of you will leave so we don’t have to do layoffs”. Layoffs look bad to shareholders, but masses of people quitting? Meh, it happens now.

        • melisdrawing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Same with the ‘getting better ideas in person’ bit. He means he can’t take credit for others’ work if everything is documented.

      • doctortofu@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh I emphatically agree - I have a fully remote job and not even doubling my salary would make me consider switching to an office one. I was just clumsily trying to point out that a lot of corporate positions don’t require all that creativity and collaboration bullshit that clueless executives love to throw around in videos like this one.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      So what’s the strat here? Stay employed but do not go to office until you are lid off and then lawyer up?

      Edit: spelling

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That will depend on state employment laws and the contracts they have.

        So who knows, here in Europe in my country if you are an employee then the employer determines where you work from, contractors are independent they can work from where they want.

  • arglebargle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    Kind of balsy for a software company that is basically running a web page to replace office visits with a doctor…

  • ray@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The most surprising thing I learned from this video is that WebMD still exists

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The best thing to happen from WebMD is we got a bunch of actual medical providers like Mayo Clinic, University of Maryland, Merck Manual that went, “GAH! No!!” and made actually informative, updated medical websites.

      Healthline, kids. Healthline is where we go for our medical information.

  • Bipta@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everyone is so desperate to kill their workers, and then they’ll say, “Nobody wants to work anymore.”

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “informing, not asking”

    To any employees out there, don’t be someone else’s biotch.

    Demand for workers is at one of its highest points right now.

    There are other jobs out there, but you only have one respect for yourself.

    (The above is said assuming that the company is not trying to just shed employees. If that is the case, then stay and give them hell. Only you can determine the state of the company you’re working at, financially.)

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    “We’ve invested heavily in our cooperate headquarters and if people realize that offices are unnecessary in the modern workplace we’ll lose millions.”

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    People keep talking about corporate real estate and how companies need ppl in offices or the value would crash. But wouldnt the company stand to benefit in the long run by just biting the bullet on the remainder of their lease, not renew, and go 100% remote? Or at least drastically downsize.

    Would that not save millions in overhead, lease payments, etc into the future? Or do they have 30 year lease agreements or something?

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      They might own the building. They definitely have at least a 10 year lease, that’s standard for commercial lease agreements.