The Pentagon has its eye on the leading AI company, which this week softened its ban on military use.
  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    12·
    10 months ago

    Anyone that thought AI was never going to be used militarily is a fool. The only question was “How soon?”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    4·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    OpenAI this week quietly deleted language expressly prohibiting the use of its technology for military purposes from its usage policy, which seeks to dictate how powerful and immensely popular tools like ChatGPT can be used.

    “We aimed to create a set of universal principles that are both easy to remember and apply, especially as our tools are now globally used by everyday users who can now also build GPTs,” OpenAI spokesperson Niko Felix said in an email to The Intercept.

    Suchman and Myers West both pointed to OpenAI’s close partnership with Microsoft, a major defense contractor, which has invested $13 billion in the LLM maker to date and resells the company’s software tools.

    The changes come as militaries around the world are eager to incorporate machine learning techniques to gain an advantage; the Pentagon is still tentatively exploring how it might use ChatGPT or other large-language models, a type of software tool that can rapidly and dextrously generate sophisticated text outputs.

    While some within U.S. military leadership have expressed concern about the tendency of LLMs to insert glaring factual errors or other distortions, as well as security risks that might come with using ChatGPT to analyze classified or otherwise sensitive data, the Pentagon remains generally eager to adopt artificial intelligence tools.

    Last year, Kimberly Sablon, the Pentagon’s principal director for trusted AI and autonomy, told a conference in Hawaii that “[t]here’s a lot of good there in terms of how we can utilize large-language models like [ChatGPT] to disrupt critical functions across the department.”

    The original article contains 1,196 words, the summary contains 254 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    210·
    10 months ago

    Just a reminder that last year US military failed with Clearview database powered AI glasses for soldiers for more efficient killing, and Boston Dynamics contracted by military failed at autonomous war robots.

    The faster NATO’s military and infrastructure existence are fully neutralised as a humanity wiping level threat, the better it is for the rest of the world. This is about as comical as Eren Jaeger (USA) genociding rest of the world to protect his handful friends.