They’re affordable and ubiquitous, but homeowners shouldn’t be able to act as vigilantes.

    • RoboRay@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s great, right up until Ring unilaterally decides to…

      Which is a completely different topic than the one I quoted. The article said that equipment owners shouldn’t be able to provide their videos to the police without the police first getting a warrant, which is an utterly ridiculous position to take.

      OBVIOUSLY the police should have a warrant to get the video without the equipment owner’s permission, but that’s not what the author said.

      • spizzat2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Absolutely fair response. I’m sorry that I came across as attacking your point. I just meant to provide another reason why the cameras shouldn’t be recommended, using the context of your quote from the article. I’m sorry that I wasn’t clear about that.