• Mamertine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, and I’ll counter that argument by suggesting we ban having sex with children regardless of if the molester is related.

      • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? It’s only like 1.7 to 2.8% more of a chance of a birth defect. That’s nothing. That’s gambling odds easy. Every day.

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It largely depends on how prevalent it is socially.

          In societies where first cousin reproduction isn’t common, the increased risk of birth defects is about the same as a pregnancy where the mother is in her 40s.

          In societies where it is common, the rates can go up sharply though when it compounds across generations.

          • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good point. Who cares about the lower rates, honestly? Its not like we’re the ones that have to live with the defect lol, keep blasting homies