• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    My point is that this isn’t a binary situation, but rather a spectrum. Some systems do a better job than others in mitigating these problems. In general, a system needs to be structured in such a way where personal interest aligns with the common interest. Capitalism does the opposite by creating competition between individuals at the cost of social cohesion.

    • rah
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      this isn’t a binary situation, but rather a spectrum

      I disagree. It is binary, either the word is meaningfully applied in this context or it isn’t. You said that capitalism “enables” exploitation. Being alive enables exploitation. Capitalism may encourage exploitation, it may increase exploitation but I wouldn’t say it “enables” exploitation.

      Unless you have some argument that capitalism somehow provides some specific cause to enable exploitation which is absent from all other systems, while all other systems also provide some different cause which also happens to enable exploitation, your statement that capitalism enables exploitation is incorrect. The specific cause that enables exploitation is being alive and is nothing specific to capitalism. Capitalism is not what enables exploitation. Capitalism does not enable exploitation.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, capitalism enables exploitation by allowing people who own capital to decide working conditions for people who do not. This is why exploitation is seen everywhere capitalism has ever been tried. I’ve also gave you a concrete example contrasting communism in USSR and the transition to capitalism along with all the horrors that followed. You just proceeded to ignore that.

        • rah
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          People deciding working conditions for others is not absent from all other systems.

            • rah
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In response to my comment asserting

              Unless you have some argument that capitalism somehow provides some specific cause to enable exploitation which is absent from all other systems …

              you stated

              capitalism enables exploitation by allowing people who own capital to decide working conditions for people who do not

              which appears to be you attempting to make that argument.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, the argument being made is that having a handful of oligarchs who own capital make such decisions leads to exploitation. People who have been appointed democratically by the people to represent them deciding such things is a completely different matter. A government in a communist society represents the people, and the means of production are publicly owned by the people. That’s what prevents exploitation that capitalism enables by allowing people to rule over others.

                • rah
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  leads to exploitation

                  You’ve introduce a new term here, “leads to”. The discussion we’ve been having was about whether it is valid to say that capitalism “enables” exploitation, not “leads to”. They’re not the same thing.

                  It’s clear from this change in your wording and from this discussion in general that you’re being loose in your use of terminology. We’re having a discussion about whether a particular term is used in a valid way so being loose in the use of terminology completely obviates the discussion.

                  I think the problem is that you don’t want to have a discussion about the use of the word “enable”, you want to rage against capitalism.

                  exploitation that capitalism enables

                  Capitalism isn’t what enables exploitation.

                  Take care.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’ve introduce a new term here, “leads to”. The discussion we’ve been having was about whether it is valid to say that capitalism “enables” exploitation, not “leads to”. They’re not the same thing.

                    I use leads to as in systemically creates a situation that results in exploitation. You’re just playing word games here now. Once again, I’ve explained the precise mechanic responsible, and you continue to ignore that while fixating on the type of wording I’m using instead of addressing the substance of what’s being said.

                    I think the problem is that you don’t want to have a discussion about the use of the word “enable”, you want to rage against capitalism.

                    I think the problem is that you’re not engaging with what I’m saying and have not put forward any coherent argument.

                    Capitalism isn’t what enables exploitation.

                    Repeating something over and over doesn’t make it true.

                    Take care.