• redtea@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, Russia could use the same logic with the west/Ukraine. Hence the rule to not kill journalists.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Russia claims all manner of outlandish drivel. If a journalist is killed by munitions you’ve been using for over a year yourself in a warzone you created I bring out my tiny violin.

        • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          By that same logic, Russia should shed no tears if those munitions kill journalists who can simply be rebranded propagandists. Hence the need not to judge whether a journalist is a propagandist and to avoid killing civilians holding press cards.

          (Aside: Russia would be right in saying that the West locks up it’s journalists, especially those who highlight war crimes, and could point to one resident of Belmarsh in particular as incontrovertible evidence.)

          • Omega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Russia can and does lie to justify their actions. So you’re right that they can lie and then do whatever they want, as they always do.

            And the West does not lock up all of its journalists. Dissent is literally illegal in Russia.

            • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you think dissent is legal in the west, you haven’t been paying attention.