I started making generic library signs instead of visiting Reddit. I’m trusting you to not post them IRL.

There is an odd question that goes along with this one.

Edit: In the interest of not spamming the comm, here’s “an otter one”.

Edit: Whoops, missed a few.

  • Beefalo@midwest.social
    24·
    11 months ago

    Welp, fellas, I think we have our first Lemmy meme straight from our own mines, I ain’t seen’t the like elsewhere, that’s for certain.

    Now that the tone has been set I hope everyone’s ready to get fricken weird with it.

    • ilex@lemmy.worldOP
      6·
      11 months ago

      Speaking of fricken weird. I use one of the posts to make a template to use up some of the weird otters I had set aside. It’s lame if the format is all the same, but it’s quicker.

  • Oisteink@lemmy.world
    11·
    11 months ago

    I wanna see moar! I might print one - keep in mind we have logos on the bottom part, one left, one right - I will have to check with communication before I can add that for completeness. Unless it’s art exhibit… I’ll show them to our art curator.

  • yeather@lemmy.ca
    9·
    11 months ago

    Jokes on you liberal, these are going up in my college on Monday, and I’m gonna in the very library they will be posted in!

  • GooseFinger@lemmy.world
    7·
    11 months ago

    These photos may very well be my new favorite thing on the internet.

    Thinking about getting one printed for my wall in the study…

    • ilex@lemmy.worldOP
      8·
      11 months ago

      Oh, in a world of humanoid otters, are regular otters on leashes pets or pets?

        • ilex@lemmy.worldOP
          4·
          11 months ago
          A v ~B = T
~A v B = T
 A v B = T
~A v ~B = F

          I can’t argue with that logic.

          • 30isthenew29@lemm.ee
            2·
            11 months ago

            I don’t understand this but I can sort of understand seen by the calculations but I don’t understand. You’re cool :)

            • ilex@lemmy.worldOP
              3·
              11 months ago

              This comment is vertically long. Paragraphs and sentences are short.

              There are two senses of the word “or.” Inclusive and exclusive.

              Inclusive | one, the other, or both
Exclusive | one, the other, but not both

              In English, most instances are inclusive, like above. Exclusive might look like: Is the US President Joe Biden or not? Is that a square or circle, or neither?

              I took you question to be you asking if the or was inclusive, but in a normal, funny way. The T/F statements define why ‘both’ can be an option. ‘Both’ might still be wrong factually, but logically, it’s possible.

              This style of logic is often called Boolean algebra. You’ll see it often in programming and simple search engines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

              It is literally Logic 101 at most universities.

      • Nika@lemmy.world
        1·
        11 months ago

        Look at us and monkeys. We evolved to suit our environment and overcome challenges that we faced. Monkeys didn’t evolve because they didn’t go out and face these things.

        Edit: basically, we generally don’t fuck the monkeys and anthropomorphic otters generally wouldn’t fuck normal otters. I’d classify it as zoophilia.