I fucked with the title a bit. What i linked to was actually a mastodon post linking to an actual thing. but in my defense, i found it because cory doctorow boosted it, so, in a way, i am providing the original source here.
please argue. please do not remove.
I agree with your statement as stated. (EDIT: title has changed since posting)
The part I have an issue with is the output that tends to fall into 4 categories:
output that is creative and unique is acceptable
output tricked into revealing source is infringement
output not creative, as in biometric identification, utilizes the entirety of copyright work in a non-transformative way and needs to be licensed.
output of creative work, while not copyrightable, can still infringe trademark.