Democratic lawmakers in Oregon on Tuesday unveiled a sweeping new bill that would undo a key part of the state’s first-in-the-nation drug decriminalization law, a recognition that public opinion has soured on the measure amid rampant public drug use during the fentanyl crisis.

The bill would recriminalize the possession of small amounts of drugs as a low-level misdemeanor, enabling police to confiscate them and crack down on their use on sidewalks and in parks, its authors said. It also aims to make it easier to prosecute dealers, to access addiction treatment medication, and to obtain and keep housing without facing discrimination for using that medication.

  • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    Do you think kids should be subjected to people shooting up drugs when playing outside or when going to school?

    I am anti drug war personally but if any situation led to it being easier for kids to be subjected to that, that seems like a worse world.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wont someone think of the children!?!??!?!?!!??!?!?!??!

      Very “Hello fellow kids” kinda comment with that “im anti drug war…” part

      Beyond all that, countries like Netherlands have safe injection sites where users can get clean needles, be in a safe space for consumption, test kits for safety, and monitors to watch for accidental overdoses.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oregon doesn’t have that kind of funding or ability to organize. Portland is a massive shit-show of mismanagement.

        I don’t want drug use to be a crime either, but ffs this isn’t the way.

        • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Harm reduction sites already exist in Portland and provide many of those services. The US justice department has traditionally been a block for doing more.

          • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            The drugs laws in place since the 80s have essentially made providing any type of support to a drug user in the United States a federal offense. This is why safe injection sites in New York City took decades to open and essentially opened in defiance of Federal rulings against such sites source. Corporate Counsel for the City of New York has essentially dared the Federal government to come stop them citing a public health emergency in preventing overdoses, and the U.S. Attorney (Prosecutor) for the Southern District of NY (where the sites are) promising swift enforcement (which has yet to materialize) source

            • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m glad the second article got into the history a bit. Regardless of what the prosecutor is saying, the Biden DoJ has signaled more openness, but the election could change things quickly.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      All these negative effects are consequences of the war on drugs, not the drugs themselves. If society treats drug addicts as patients instead of as criminals, things get better. This has worked every time it’s been tried. The only reason it isn’t done in a larger scale is people who benefit from the war on drugs preventing it.

      • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Do you think if we stop the war on drugs, that will reduce the number of homeless drug addicted people? I don’t think it will. There’s need to be more to it than that, otherwise you’re literally not preparing for the 2nd half of that foot drop.

        I largely agree alot of these problems are a result of criminalizing drug use but decriminizing doesn’t solve some of these problems with homeless folks which is probably more related to mental health services.

        • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ending the war on drugs will not solve every problem. But at least things will stop getting worse. And it’ll make it far easier to tackle all the other problems.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes. Why hide the world when it’s right in front of them? Tall to the child, tell them what is happening and do not imply judgement. Unless you feel the need to talk shit about those with drug addiction, then that’s your personal thing but most folks find that kind of thing distasteful since its metaphorically kicking someone while they are stuck in a life they can’t get out of. And many do want out, want to quit, but they lack the help and resources to escape. So if you are upset at seeing this and want others to “think of the children”, ask yourself what you will do about it?

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s one reason why more progressive areas have safe injection sites. Wanna guess who’s generally against those?

      • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s a relevant point. We don’t allow cigarette companies to advertise to children so should it be acceptable to advertise crack or coke?

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The ban on tobacco advertisements is a relatively recent thing.

          We’re inundated with ads for alcohol and pharmaceuticals.

          Super unhealthy sugar-filled snacks and breakfast cereals made up like 90% of TV commercials when I was growing up.