Bloved Madman@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 months agoSurface Laptop 3 running Kubuntu, such an improvement over what it was "designed" for.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1345arrow-down119 cross-posted to: surface@lemmy.ca
arrow-up1326arrow-down1imageSurface Laptop 3 running Kubuntu, such an improvement over what it was "designed" for.lemmy.worldBloved Madman@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square82fedilink cross-posted to: surface@lemmy.ca
minus-squareTCB13@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·10 months agoEverything’s about perspective… maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P
minus-squareaksdb@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months agoLook on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.
minus-squareTCB13@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-210 months agoHold on, I was kind of joking, I’m not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.
minus-squareaksdb@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoAll good, but I think it’s really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.
Everything’s about perspective… maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P
Look on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.
Hold on, I was kind of joking, I’m not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.
All good, but I think it’s really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.