• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So? 100% of users never used the fediverse before it existed. Bluesky / ATProtocol is now offering an alternative where usernames are not tied to instances, and that sounds like a better UX.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you don’t want to discuss the relative merits of Bluesky, don’t participate in a thread on Bluesky.

        bye

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          i thought this thread was about me correcting misunderstandings about activitypub software. i have no interest in bluesky until/unless they either aferro gpl their code or implement activitypub federation. there are no merits to their network that i can see unless one or both of those come to pass.

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            i thought this thread was about me correcting misunderstandings about activitypub software

            I don’t see a title saying “self post: let me correct you about the activitypub protocol”, I see a link to Bluesky launching federated storage.

            there are no merits to their network that i can see unless one or both of those come to pass

            Then don’t engage in a discussion about their identity system, just post a blanket comment saying “they suck cause they’re not open enough” and leave the thread. The rest of us are here discussing the relative merits of one protocol vs another.