Could be a huge deal.

  • noodle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a bit of a cynical take. $345m is not that much to the US government. It’s not going to deprive anyone in the US. Plus, what are homeless people going to do with military equipment?

    If it was $345bn I’d agree but this is barely even going to register on the accounting spreadsheet.

    • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. . . > This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.

      • US President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
      • noodle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay, this is a nice sentiment but the money is long gone. It was spent when the equipment was made. It will either be scrapped or left to rust in a hangar.