Defending free speech that says good things is different than defending free speech that is just being racist.

That’s kinda the point I’m making, though. This argument is not nuanced enough, because the only standard it sets is that for something to be truly offensive, it must “offend everyone”. This is an absurd and impossible standard.

The implication of hypocrisy that you’re suggesting with your comment doesn’t really work unless you view all speech as equivalent, which it self evidently isn’t.

I didn’t say anything about hypocrisy. I just said that the argument presented is insufficient.