• Gsus4@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it is a combination between interest rate hikes from the free money paradigm that propped up startups and the gig economy and the AI hype train driving the capture of public data (think enclosures 3.0) at the expense of strong communities. This somehow reminds me of when post-dot-com bubble companies like google had to become “profitable” so “don’t be evil” went down the drain and they found ways to monetize their users’ data.

    • CarrierLost@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Don’t be evil” was always going to take second place to “make money”. That reality sucks, but it’s inevitable in a corporate oligarchy.

      • Gsus4@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re not free from it. If the fediverse took off and ISPs somehow ganged up on the activitypub protocol to force it to make money, some larger instances are going to crack, that’s what I mean.

        • Jupdown@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t understand - why would ISPs gang up on ActivityPub? How would it force larger instances to “crack”?

          Are you saying that they would ramp up costs for utilizing the protocol specifically? Wouldn’t that go against Net Neutrality…?

          • Gsus4@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I understand, I’m speculating, but from what I’ve read it happens occasionally if you try to host your own email or chat server: you may get blacklisted. Or they could hypothetically hike the costs of certain server features needed to host your own instance.