Overall, the analysis, released as a pre-print, found that RTO mandates did not improve a firm’s financial metrics, but they did decrease employee satisfaction.

Drilling down, the data indicated that RTO mandates were linked to firms with male CEOs who had greater power in the company. Here, power is measured as the CEO’s total compensation divided by the average total compensation paid to the four highest-paid executives in the firm.

This is an interesting metric. And the research outcome makes a lot of sense.

Also, RTO policies are garbage - but I’m stating the obvious.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      So many places run at varying levels of success in spite of their executives and not because of those asshats. It makes the pay disparities that much more.

        • Rickety Thudds@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Counterpoint: this goes beyond incompetence into actual hostility, and it’s actual class warfare from the top down

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh they care, just not about the worker. They care about their real estate holding company which owns the property the corporate HQ is sitting on, and the company is paying a wildly inflated lease to. They care about being able to justify renewing that lease next year.