• phobiac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Out of curiosity, how do you think governments in large capitalist economies (such as the US) properly account for greed for power and keep it in check? Do you think they are doing a good job on that front?

    • gxgx55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Poorly, but not worse than a dictatorship(such as the USSR).

      What’s your point?

      • phobiac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        You might want to turn that incredibly critical eye you’ve got for communism back in on capitalism, that’s all.

        • gxgx55@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I… am?

          What is this, I am against dictatorial abominations, so that means I am in favor of capitalist abuse? I am literally saying that opposition to capitalism is shooting itself in the foot by tolerating the existence of authoritarian “communists”.

          Unless you’re an actual tankie, your words towards me make no sense.

          • phobiac@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Misunderstanding on my end then, I made some clearly unfair assumptions. I agree with you there and apologize for the mischaracterization.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s objectively false. USSR managed to provide everyone with food, housing, healthcare, education, and jobs. Nobody worried about losing their job and ending up on the street or that they wouldn’t be able to retire in dignity. People had reasonable work hours and enjoyed over 20 days vacation. None of the capitalist regimes around today are able to achieve these things.

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          “USSR managed to provide everyone with food, housing, healthcare, education, and jobs”

          the victims of the holodomor would like a word

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s just such an intellectually dishonest comment to make, the fact that you have to go back to 1933 really shows says everything we need to know here. The fact you’ve conveniently omitted is that famines were a common occurrence before the revolution, and one of the major factors driving the revolution. During the 1932 Holodomor Famine, the USSR sent aid to affected regions in an attempt to alleviate the famine. According to Mark Tauger in his article, The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933:

            While the leadership did not stop exports, they did try to alleviate the famine. A 25 February 1933 Central Committee decree allotted seed loans of 320,000 tons to Ukraine and 240,000 tons to the northern Caucasus. Seed loans were also made to the Lower Volga and may have been made to other regions as well. Kul’chyts’kyy cites Ukrainian party archives showing that total aid to Ukraine by April 1933 actually exceeded 560,000 tons, including more than 80,000 tons of food

            Some bring up massive grain exports during the famine to show that the Soviet Union exported food while Ukraine starved. This is fallacious for a number of reasons, but most importantly of all the amount of aid that was sent to Ukraine alone actually exceeded the amount that was exported at the time.

            Aid to Ukraine alone was 60 percent greater than the amount exported during the same period. Total aid to famine regions was more than double exports for the first half of 1933.

            According to Tauger, the reason why more aid was not provided was because of the low harvest

            It appears to have been another consequence of the low 1932 harvest that more aid was not provided: After the low 1931, 1934, and 1936 harvests procured grain was transferred back to peasants at the expense of exports.

            Tauger is not a communist, yet even he is forced to acknowledge that the Soviets really did try to alleviate the famine as best as they could.

            https://www.jstor.org/stable/2500600

            The reality is that USSR doubled life expectancy in just 20 years. A newborn child in 1926-27 had a life expectancy of 44.4 years, up from 32.3 years thirty years before. In 1958-59 the life expectancy for newborns went up to 68.6 years. the Semashko system of the USSR increased lifespan by 50% in 20 years. By the 1960’s, lifespans in the USSR were comparable to those in the USA:

            Quality of nutrition improved after the Soviet revolution, and the last time USSR had a famine was in 1940s. CIA data suggests they ate just as much as Americans after WW2 period while having better nutrition:

            Try harder with your trolling.