Photos reveal melted lampposts, power line poles split in half and charred homes in the Texas Panhandle as the state battles its second-largest wildfire in state history.
Exactly. So people have a chance to get real information on this topic. Too many people get information from journalistic sources. Modern journalism is concerned with advertising dollars not dissemination of accurate information.
Fine. Here is a link to a YouTube video which summarizes the points of the IPCC report. Note this video is about the 2022 report but I linked to the 2023 report above.
You keep linking me to things but you can’t ever talk about them. I’m not interested in wasting my time reading something or listening to something you can’t talk about. Just tell me what they said that argues against my point and we will discuss that.
Official? I mean, it’s not official. It’s just a document for policymakers. Just because you don’t agree with me doesn’t mean you need to support a document you haven’t read just because the person who posted it is possibly arguing against my opinion.
Please feel free to provide quotes from the report.
The best parts are the diagrams.
Also, getting info from snippets and headlines must die.
So, what about this googled pdf provided you with the opinion that reversing climate change was within our grasp? Quotes would help.
I wrote no statement either agreeing or disagreeing with your assertions.
You just felt like posting a link?
Exactly. So people have a chance to get real information on this topic. Too many people get information from journalistic sources. Modern journalism is concerned with advertising dollars not dissemination of accurate information.
What part of this real information argues against my points? Since you read it, you can tell me.
Fine. Here is a link to a YouTube video which summarizes the points of the IPCC report. Note this video is about the 2022 report but I linked to the 2023 report above.
https://youtu.be/by20roonzoM
You keep linking me to things but you can’t ever talk about them. I’m not interested in wasting my time reading something or listening to something you can’t talk about. Just tell me what they said that argues against my point and we will discuss that.
You’re making the points. You go read the official publication, and tell us how it stacks up against your bullet list of doom.
Official? I mean, it’s not official. It’s just a document for policymakers. Just because you don’t agree with me doesn’t mean you need to support a document you haven’t read just because the person who posted it is possibly arguing against my opinion.