You guys know the real history, I’d be reading propaganda if I went on any other website

So tell me, real short, what triggered the collapse. Especially when it seemed to be doing well in the 80s.

Okay, you can get wordy if you really need to.

  • JoeySteel [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    5 sentences…Cant do that as you’re asking a lot but I’ll be as brief as poss

    Kruschev came to power in a military coup and repressed (either removed or killed) the loyal Marxist-Leninists after Stalin tried to implement a bill that would democratise Soviet society . In his last year in power he wrote Economic problems of the USSR attacking the revisionists

    Enver Hoxha (leader of Communist Albania) said that that one of the Kruschevites told him they had Stalin killed (1)

    Kruschev represented the nascent bourgeois but with Stalins popularity in the Ussr he could not implement his reforms. He does a secret speech that immediately gets leaked to the West (funny that) heaping all the problems in Soviet society on Stalin which was entirely falsified. The Secret speech itself was leaked in such a way to pour poison through the Communist party - it was disseminated to the top leaders and cadres of the millions of Communist Party members (something like 0.9% of the Party). Meaning it was not out in the open that could be honestly fought and corrected. If that speech had been public the revisionists would’ve swung from lampposts

    He let out numerous counter revolutionaries from prisons and “rehabilitated” those shot during the Moscow trials like Tukhachevsky who we know now were guilty beyond doubt.

    With Stalin denigrated he was free to implement the reforms (post Stalin Soviet textbooks would legit have stuff like "profit is needed and the central planning system is a Stalinist hold over. Kruschev even declared the primacy of profit in industry in1961) starting with the privatisation of the tractor stations where the farmers basically collectively owned their means of production and by 1965 the Kosygin reforms were implemented which

    • reinstated the profit motive and the market

    • attacked the central planning system and directive system

    • allowed for the firing and hiring of people

    • gave more power to the managerial class (who previously could basically be fired by the workers and the manager couldnt fire them)

    It is this restoration of capital forces in Soviet society that led to a hypernormalisation within Soviet society (ie. They’re told “we’re building socialism” as socialism is being destroyed) until eventually they reached a point where they just pulled down the red flag, sold state industries to pennies to the nascent oligarchs and mafia in waiting and gave up the entire thing altogether

    Despite this many people fought to keep Soviet socialism alive and Yeltsin could only come to power by shelling the parliament with tanks, supported by the West and massacring 3000 Communists in the streets. To this the Western press praised Yeltsin who is now uni formally described as the worst Russian ruler in history in Russia.

    Yeltsin never would’ve won an election were it not for the West who proudly boasted about it

    For the other non-shitlib on this site that is capable of reading more than 5 sentences I would recommend reading

    The Complete Collapse Of Revisionism by Harpal Brar

    RESTORATION of CAPITALISM in the USSR by Martin Nicholaus

    THE RESTORATION OF CAPITALISM IN THE SOVIET UNION. by Bill Bland

    References

    (1) “All this villainy emerged soon after the death, or to be more precise after the murder, of Stalin. I say after the murder of Stalin, because Mikoyan himself told me . . . that they, together with Khrushchev and their associates, had decided . . . to make an attempt on Stalin’s life”. (E. Hoxha, With Stalin: Memoirs, p. 31).

    • Rev [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Funny how the things you describe is how China decided to operate. Quite hilarious seeing Stalinists in other posts doing the mental contortions trying to reconcile their adherence to a strictly planned economy with their adulation for Dengist China. At least previous Stalinists were internally consistent and pivoted to Hoxhaism.

      the nascent bourgeois

      Hm… I wonder who came before Khrushev who let them become nascent. His name escapes me, maybe you can help?

      those shot during the Moscow trials like Tukhachevsky who we know now were guilty beyond doubt

      A later Soviet investigative commission found that almost none of those people were guilty and their “confessions” were extracted under torture. Funnily enough the Tribunal sentencing Tuchachevsky and Yakir (two of the most decorated and forward thinking red military leaders) was itself purged (save for 3 members, among them an absolute military retrograde Budyonniy). So who should we believe then if it’s seemingly traitors all the way down? Hell maybe Stalin was a traitor and secret Nazi collaborator himself, the NKVD just didn’t get to him in time? See the absurdity of this hyper-paranoid conspiratorial thinking. The only thing beyond doubt here is that Stalin wrecked the military, stripped the party of it’s most dedicated members (starting with cowardly killing Frunze via forced surgery) and fostered an atmosphere of constant suspicion and sycophancy towards careerist bureaucrats. Saying he had dreams of democratising Soviet society in the last year before his death just doesn’t cut it and is quite rich when he had presided over this same society for close to 30 years and somehow never bothered to do this before.