• SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Israel could surrender to Hamas. But I’m sure you have some reservations about that outcome. Strange how you wouldn’t consider palastinians reservations to that as equal. Or maybe you don’t need to operate on the concept of unconditional surrender just to justify your dick wagging

      • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        4 months ago

        are you actually serious? israelis surrendering to hamas eventhough hamas attacked first?

        this website is cooked

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, Hamas attacked first on October 7th, and before that it was all sunshine and daisies and everyone held hands and sang and Israel definitely hasn’t been conquering Palestine since 1948.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            Israelis can just go back to the lands they were originally driven from, right?…

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Which we can keep tracing back to ceasefires that keep being broken by israel such as the Al Aqsa raid.

              Point is that the notion that this somehow started on oct7 while israel was bombing Gaza just two weeks before is ridiculous. There was no ceasefire at the moment of the attack.

              • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                My understanding is that Hamas has also repeatedly broken ceasefires. It doesn’t seem like the ceasefire agreements are as effective as they should be.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Because israel keeps attacking the west bank. They just can’t help themseles from not doing ethnic cleansing. Or claiming Hamas fired a rocket and just attacking Gaza.

                  • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I am by no means an expert, but I’ve been hearing about the conflict from both sides for several decades now. My take away is that both sides seem ideologically opposed to the existence of the other.

                    If Israel stopped all aggression today, I don’t think it would stop the rockets; likewise Palestine could halt all aggression and still be attacked by the IDF. Lasting peace will require a shift in perspective, which gets harder to imagine with every day of the invasion.