Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Ah another name calling session because you can’t articulate a point. You incorrectly couldn’t identify the genocide attack as declared by international law as the start of the current conflict.
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Not sure why you are trying to insult people who disagree with your stance. Is that how weak your argument is ?
Removed by mod
Removed, rule 5:
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Ah another name calling session because you can’t articulate a point. You incorrectly couldn’t identify the genocide attack as declared by international law as the start of the current conflict.
Removed by mod
Removed, rule 5:
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I rescind my complaints and anger. Thank you for being reasonable.
No, YOU’RE BEING REASONABLE! ;)
Seriously… you should see some of the crap we deal with.
I can only imagine. Thanks again, and keep up the good work