In my continued exposure to leftist spaces and a leftist view on history it has become clear that all I understand about Stalin is the reactionary rhetoric I’ve been fed my whole life. I have only just started on reading theory and exposing myself to a leftist view, so Stalin as a topic isn’t something I’ve reached yet.

But I have to ask, and I think this is the place to ask it, what is the deal with Stalin?

The vibe I get is that people at a minimum don’t hate Stalin, but also maybe at most appricate Stalin. I’m aware that the efforts of the USSR during WW2, especially in regards to Nazi aggression are a credit to his administration and leadership, but is that really where the vibe starts and stops?

I’m not looking for a dissertation on the guy, but just the notes or primary points. I’ll take reading suggestions too.

Thanks comrades.

  • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Stalin’s contributions to the world is not just defeating the Nazis, ok?

    I didn’t say that.

    All of what you said contributed to movements and countries, but it doesn’t change the fact that most of them don’t want to mention Stalin, which is what OP is asking about.