to start: after some consideration, we’ve altered our entry question a little bit so that entry is not guaranteed. during the daytime you can basically expect waits of 30 minutes or less when it comes to approval/disapproval, but overnight it’ll be anywhere from 6-12 hours. just FYI
if you’d like to introduce yourself without it getting lost in all the posts already made, i just made a thread for that over here
our sidebar should give you most of the information you’re looking for about us, but to reiterate some: we are pretty relaxed here, but we have a well carved out understanding of what we want to be. if you would like more elaboration on that, you can find elaboration on that at length in the following two posts:
for some less lengthy and more relaxed elaboration, see the discussion in the comments of this post.
as for funding: we are 100% user-funded. if you would like to contribute to our ability to keep the website up, you can donate on OpenCollective, which supports both one-time donations or monthly donations.
a few other questions occasionally pop up like “why do we have the set of communities we do?” and “why can’t people make their own?” (the latter is a feature of lemmy). for elaboration on that, you can see the following post and the discussions here. we are open to suggestions and creating communities as demand sees fit; see also discussion here.
downvotes are disabled on this instance and that’s a thing we’re not liable to change. if you’d like elaboration for why that is, see this comment. this may be a point of friction for some coming from reddit, but i hope you’ll understand why we’re doing it even if you don’t necessarily agree with it.
if you’re interested in our governance to this point and a brief idea of our long term goals, see the comment here.
feel free to sound off on other questions you have; i’ll try to update the OP with those and our ability to answer them as time goes on.
You must log in or register to comment.
hello! i’m excited to participate in this community and i’m looking forward to seeing how it grows. to briefly introduce myself, IRL i’m an engineering student and community activist, online i’m a writer and game developer. i speak Cebuano, English, Tagalog, and German.
i’m also on tech.lgbt (mastodon) as well if anyone wants to connect there. :)
i appreciate the community-focused perspective and the restorative justice approach to accountability that Beehaw has. i discovered this through the main lemmy site and was instantly sold. one question i have is - and sorry if what i’m asking isn’t entirely coherent, but - how does Beehaw’s governance work? is that enumerated somewhere? most social media communities are semi- or fully authoritarian, and while Beehaw seems to differ, i’m just curious if there’s some kind of document or ongoing community discussion about how Beehaw is run.
i appreciate the community-focused perspective and the restorative justice approach to accountability that Beehaw has - i discovered this through the main lemmy site and was instantly sold. one question i have is - and sorry if what i’m asking isn’t entirely coherent, but - how does Beehaw’s governance work? is that enumerated somewhere? most social media communities are semi- or fully authoritarian, and while Beehaw seems to differ, i’m just curious if there’s some kind of document or ongoing community discussion about how Beehaw is run.
right now: the governance is pretty simple so we haven’t bothered to enumerate it anywhere or anything. in the future we probably will now that we have a lot more users. we’ve talked through a lot of this stuff in the year and a half of the website to this point.
for the time being: it’s the three of us admins (me, Gaywallet, Chris Remington) currently and on anything more substantial than “obviously bad faith person” we tend to collectively talk through decisions to the best ability possible/time permitting. if we add more admins, they’ll also have that kind of input. unless otherwise stated you can pretty much assume we’ve all agreed to something if it’s in effect here. it’s not explicitly written anywhere, but i’d also say we’re interested in community input when possible (and within the confines of the mission we have), because we don’t have a website without users, lol
on the backend, Chris currently controls the website, pays our bills, and stuff like that, but all three of us have access to the components that run the website and the financials. in the event he has to step away or something similar, we will be able to take control as needed.
in the very, very long term and feasibility permitting we would like to have some sort of democratically elected board controlling the website and its broader goal (ideally a co-operative),[1] but right now we’re really just trying to keep the website going and be financially solvent.
hopefully that sort of gives an idea–i’m sure the other mods may have input here also, so i’ll shoot them this comment in the morning
and yeah, we’re aware of the potential drawbacks and points of failure that could introduce, hence why it’s a very long term goal. that’s a sort of thing we’d need to do responsibly, if we can do it at all! ↩︎
Thanks for the warm welcome, I’m happy to see somewhere new besides Reddit (Yet another Reddit refugee, natch). New to federated type content, and I was initially thrown off by the multiple server style, rather than the central system Reddit employs, so this is going to be a learning experience. Please forgive any faux pas on my part while I get acquainted _
An easy way to think about federation is similar to email
When you set up an account on a centralised service, your username is simply “duskyheaps” as you only go to the one site.
With federation, you have a collection of servers and you create an account on one instance and so you become “duskyheap@beehaw.org”.
You could create an account on lemmy.ml and that would be “duskyheaps@lemmy.ml”.
Once you account for this, you’ll find it easier to find people or communities on other servers. Off the top of my head and this maybe incorrect but it would be something like “beehaw.org/community@instance.org” (I’ll come back and edit this to correct it)
edit 2: Before anyone gets confused by this comment, here is some solution. The examples here are how a web browser displays the URL in the address field. For a link to work in the federation, the browser must be made to assume we want to link to another webpage within the same domain (that is, the server we are logged on to). This is done by omitting the domain from a HTML referance. Of course. It’s W3C standard. See this post which clarified it: https://lemmy.ml/post/1168136.
… unfortunately, links to federated posts and comments are still broken because posts synced to other instances get a different ID than the original.
end edit 2original comment:
“beehaw.org/c/community@instance.org” – example: beehaw.org/c/lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
or lemmy-specific syntax that will bring up a list of communities known to your instance as you type, and choosing from there will make it a link: “!community@instance.org” – example: !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
… unfortunately, this dosnt work for lnksedit: seems that i just uncovered a
bugsystemic inconvenience, because the link that is generated leads you directly to that instance’s webserver … which we don’t want if this is posted on our home instance (because the link should actually enable us to post on that remote instance). otoh, if we are viewing this from a third instance, then a link “instance2.org/c/community@instance.org” would likely not work at all. (right?)
check: beehaw.org/sopuli.xyz/c/lemmy@lemmy.ml – nope!
check: /c/lemmy@lemmy.ml – yep!
