cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13401615

Something that should be considered when buying your micromobility device: Try to get something that will last and not end up as trash.

  • jabjoe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not made to be reused, not made to be repaired and not made to be recycled.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      not even made to be used without the express consent of the overlords sometimes.

      • jabjoe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yep. It’s a terrible state of affairs from some many angles. Law makes need to wake up and see how badly the market is failing and then regulated.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          sadly at this point i think well have to rebel to see common sense stuff like this happening any time soon

          • jabjoe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Right to repair laws, and the open hardware, and open source movements, are our best hope.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              i know. the point i made is that they wont pass good laws, or open source anything that matters without being forced to.

              • jabjoe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I see right to repair as the thin edge of the wedge, and it is being driven into cracks. The is good movement for this in the US and the EU. France has a repairability index. It will take time, but in the end openness will win out because it is just better. Part of the way of forcing the issue is copyleft. So much out there is already built on open and closed the last mile. Good example of copyleft doing it’s thing is in 3D printers, for example : https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  i wish!

                  eventually the suits will start pushing back. and most of these getting passed are (to my knowledge) actually hamful if you get to the nuts and bolts.

                  • jabjoe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Suits aren’t evil. I mean I’m they aren’t good either, but all they care about is money. They push for closed because that is where the money is, but they have no resolve on anything. Law makers either try and follow experts or money.

                    To the extent either believe anything, they believe the IP lie and thus don’t see the tragedy of the commons they advocate.

                    Open however has passion, and is technically correct. (The best kind of correct.)

                    Little by little, we’ll keep winning out. Right to repair is an important front, but so is digital rights, privacy and competition.