public class GameManager : MonoBehaviour { public bool EnableHighContrast; public bool PlayerWon; public float PlayerUnitsMoved; public int PlayerDeathCount; public float PlayerHealth; public void PlayerTakeDamage(float damage) { PlayerHealth -= damage; if (PlayerHealth < 0) { PlayerDieAndRespawn(); } } public void PlayerDieAndRespawn() { return; } }I couldn’t contain myself.
Should it be
PlayerHealth <= 0?
Otherwise the player could have 0 health and not die? I’m sleep deprived so forgive me if I’m wrong
You are correct.
Counting this meme as my first FOSS contribution
Holy shit I was there with you sir! With the zeros and stuff
Open up ticket first, please. Thanks Codemonkey.
You are correct about it allowing you to have zero health and not die, but whether or not that’s the correct behavior will depend on the game. Off the top of my head I know that Street Fighter, some versions at least, let you cling to life at zero.
I know this is /c/Progammerhumor, but I wanted to pull on this thread a little bit for my own edification. I’m a Python guy and have been a while, but I’ve dabbled in other languages. The screenshot says “MonoBehaviour” which makes me assume this is mono or a .Net-like language (you know what happens when you assume).
If your player health is a float, would mono or .Net have an issue comparing the float with integer zero “0”? I mean, it seems like floating point precision may make it impossible for it to ever “equal” integer zero, but it also seems like the code isn’t accounting for that precision error.
Am I overthinking this?
Floating point errors are a product of how floating points work as a mathematical concept. So they’re independent of the programming language and can happen everywhere.
In this case though, I doubt it’s a critical issue. So the player “died” when they actually had 0.000000000027 hp left or whatever. Who cares? Do you need to be that precise?
Hanging on with 1.70E-31 health.
As a noob in unity and programming, my understanding is that MonoBehavior only means that this script has to be attached as a component to a game object to function. And has no other meaning - but correct me if I’m wrong please.
This won’t work if you can ever take more than 1 damage. If you were at 1 and received 2 damage you would become invincible. You’d want to do less than or equal to.
Yay, escaped the fight with 0 health!
Well if you have a “down but not dead” condition then yes, you could escape a fight with 0 health (assuming you have teammates/pawns that can save you).
This is floating point. We also need to know what happens when you escape with -0.
I called the takeDamage function and my player disappeared: send 'elp everything foobar
Don’t worry! this issue will be fixed in the next patch. In the meantime just try not getting hit.
The doctor prescribed “getting good”
Too readable, please make each name a paragraph describing its function and how it relates to the other variables/functions around it
Great. Now that my code is self-documenting it is somehow also not legible?
Make up your damn minds, peeps!
Is this… clean code ? 💁♂️ 🦋
gestures at
butterflythis codeIs this self-documenting code?
I genuinely believe something like this is what some of my professors wanted me to submit back in school. I once got a couple points off a project for not having a clarifying comment on every single line of code. I got points off once for not comment-clarifying a fucking iterator variable. I wish I could see what they would have said if I turned in something like this. I have a weird feeling that this file would have received full marks.
Did you have my professor for intro to C? This guy was well known for failing people for plagiarism on projects where the task was basically “hello world”. And he disallowed using if/else for the first month of class.
Reminds me of an early Uni project where we had to operate on data in an array of 5 elements, but because “I didn’t teach it to everyone yet” we couldn’t use loops. It was going to be a tedious amount of copy-paste.
I think I got around it by making a function called “not_loop” that applied a functor argument to each element of the array in serial. Professor forgot to ban that.
but because “I didn’t teach it to everyone yet” we couldn’t use loops.
That is aggravating. “I didn’t teach the class the proper way to do this task, so you have to use the tedious way.” What is the logic behind that other than wasting everyone’s time?
Teaching someone the wrong way to do something frequently makes the right way make way more sense. Someone who just copy/pasted 99 near identical if statements understands on a fundamental level when, why, and where you use a for loop much more than someone who just read in the textbook “a for loop is used to iterate elements in a collection”.
Reminds me of a dude that wrote the equivalent of this in Visualg (a brazilian pseudocode language and program, meant solely for teaching programming)
if if if if if (x < 10) then print(x) else else else else elseThat the thing ran and didn’t complain about the amount of loose/needless if’s checking fuck all baffles my mind to this day.
And if I know the right way of doing it I already understand why it’s better because I want to use it in this situation. Making the students who already understand the lesson do it the wrong way is just a waste of their time.
I would take this over int a; anyday
Amateur! Ints should be called i, j or k.
Cmon now its illegal to use them anywhere other than iterators
I sometimes use
nas my loop variable (⌐■_■)n is genrally the max though. “From i=0 to n” is used in math all the time.
Not in my code
Which is fine, only it might confuse whoever then has to maintain your code.
This is the way
int IntegerThatWillBeUsedToIterateOverAListOfItemsAndModifyThem2
This is something that can easily get refactored, because the purpose of alia the variables is right there in the name. This is way better that spending three days to try to figure out what the purpose of var1 is.
Nah, refactoring this would be a bitch. Your function name contains everything that happens in the function. Which means if you add something to it, you also have to change the name of the function. So CallThisWhenThePlayerTakesDamageAndIfThePlayerHealthIsLessThanZeroThenAlsoTheyDie would have to go to something like CallThisWhenThePlayerTakesDamageAndIfThePlayerHealthIsLessThanZeroThenAlsoTheyDieAndIncrementTheTotalDamageTakenCounter if you added something else.
IDE renames all references, no issue
oh such hope
in a week
IntegerThatTracksOneThingForOnePurposewill be an object tracking 30% of the game state and mutated in 15 places without ever being renamedThen they change what the function does without updating the name and you misunderstand the code completely.
I mean, this is overdoing it a bit and the “thisVarMakesItSoThat” part is redundant, but other than that those are very descriptive property- and method names, which is not a bad thing.
It wouldn’t need to say HighContrastForAccessibilityPurposes though, it would ideally just be HighContrast, and the “for accessibility purposes” would be a comment, right?
Variable names shouldn’t need comments, period. You don’t want to look it up every time this variable is used in code, just to understand what it holds. Of course there are always exceptions, but generally names should be descriptive enough to not need additional explanation.
And context can also come from names of other things, e.g. name of a class / namespace that holds this variable. For example
AccessibilitySettings.HighContrast, where AccessibilitySettings holds all options related to accessibility.Yeah but “HighContrast” is enough; if you need to know the Why and not the What you can find a comment at the definition. There’s not need to carry the whole Wiki article everytime you need to use the variable.
I think the argument about “for accessibility” is missing the point a little bit and a common mistake most developers make.
You should endeavour to make your interface accessible by default. You shouldn’t be thinking in terms of “okay here’s the design and here’s the design that’s accessible”, you should be considering accessibility in all of your designs.
Now that’s usually a bit harder with games because you have styles and themes that you don’t want to detract from, but if your interface causes accessibility issues, it’s generally going to be bad for people that don’t have accessibility needs as well.
Accessibility benefits everyone.
Well the “Purposes” can definitly be dropped. I guess “HighContrast” would be enough if there is only a single high contrast setting, but if there are multiple then I think “HighContrastForAccessibility” would be totally fine.
Exactly this, it distinguishes it from
HighContrastForNerfedPlayer
Noone yet?
Always a relevant xkcd.
Deobfuscated code
yeah, PascalCase is the worst
I’ll take this over the more “classic” styles, when people seed to believe they were paying the compiler by the character.
I respect code golfers the same way I respect a cobra, from a distance. Don’t bring that single character naming to the codebase please.
Exactly, use emojis or gtfo
Starting my day off with this absolutely cursed image, thank you OP.
Self documenting!
The real naming fail is calling the class “GameManager”, still my number one pet peeve. With a class name as vague as that you would have to add tons of information into the variable name. (Also the class name begs for unorganized code. I mean name one function or variable that you could not justify putting into the “GameManager” class. After all if it’s managing the game it could justifiably perform any process in the game and access any state in it.)
Once you put the first bool into a class with a name like AccessibilitySettings, calling it something like HighContrast is completely sufficient.
We’ve all been guilty of these mistakes, naming stuff is hard, structuring your project is hard, learning the grains of a language takes time. But comments like these are golden nugets, some might read this and think “oh yeah, this makes sense” and rethink their whole methodology of naming and structure. You might have pushed someone reading your comment, to think more about these things.
With a class name as vague as that you would have to add tons of information into the variable name.
Technically they did exactly that.
Unity actually gives any class with the name GameManager a special gear icon. You cant just forgo the cool gear icon!
(Its not too terrible from an organizational standpoint because most of the scripts are attached to game objects. MonoBehavior is a component of GameObject. For instance, you’d never have player movement in the GameManager class, you would put it in the component class attached to the player character GameObject.)
you’d never have player movement in the GameManager class
You want to bet? (Source: I teach game programming on a college level.)
But yeah, your comment about the gear icon is sadly more true than people may realize. Game developers do questionable things. => Engine developers cater to people. => Students argue that if something is supported it can’t be that bad. Sometimes it feels like fighting windmills.
“Manager” classes often end up like “God classes”, just like how “Utils” classes end up with a bunch of random stuff in them.
At my first job I was working on an MMO and we had a DatabaseManager class with 10k+ lines of code. Less than the first 200 lines actually used any of the members of that class.
Looks ugly until you need to implement something and realize you’ve been blessed with a description of business logic.
Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.
Until they find out that the way to descriptive variables or functions needs to be extended with new business logic requiring renaming of functions again and again.
I think maintaining code with this level of verbose naming, will be a pain over time. If they don’t let the naming slip, and then they could as well use cryptic 3 letter names.
Reminds me of this https://lemmy.world/post/12487512
