• antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I kind of find it funny that people on Lemmy are so strictly against owning multiple houses, while it was completely ordinary for many people in my country (Croatia) to own two houses while the country was under literal socialist government (Yugoslavia).

    • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Was housing guaranteed in Yugoslavia? If everyone was guaranteed at least a shitty apartment, it would explain why there was less hate towards those who own several houses.

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        less hate towards those who own several houses

        There wasn’t hate, period. I find it a foreign and even anachronistic mindset, I’d sooner expect people here to be simply jealous of those better-off. Also, owning several houses, not just two, could be problematic, the govt would probably try to nationalise some of them, at the very least in the early period.

        I don’t know the details of how it was all managed, housing wasn’t definitely guaranteed (SFRY had a rapid urbanisation of the population, and apparently it wasn’t easy to meet the demand for new housing), but overall the rate of homelessness was quite low, in part also thanks to the culture that didn’t mind large families living in a single house.