It’s almost as if they negotiations are on going and this article is just a media outlet trying to get clicks and a narrative going without any concrete info to report on.

Hamas agreed to conditions that were not what Israel put forth. That means they refused to accept those conditions.

Gaza needs to be abide by the ceasefire

Hamas has a long track record of breaking ceasfires. Their demands usually include releasing terrorists that were caught trying to murder civilians within Israel in exchanges that are 1000+:1 with hostages/bodies they hold. For those who aren’t just tuning in just for this latest conflict, this isn’t exactly news worth even mentioning until an actual deal is struck.

Yeah, but headlines like this are just plain misleading. Hamas agreed to conditions that weren’t the ones put forth by Israel. That means it’s effectively meaningless, since we don’t know how much the terms were altered.

An official familiar with Israeli thinking said Israeli officials were examining the proposal, but the plan approved by Hamas was not the framework Israel proposed.

So Hamas accepted a proposal that was not proposed by Israel, effectively making this meaningless. Hamas will also accept proposals for Israel to stop existing, doesn’t mean that will happen either.

Looking at the content posted, that’s clearly a no.

You realize the name Palestine is what the Romans renamed the land to add insult to injury after kicking out all the Jews.

Tripping on an uneven sidewalk and hitting your head against the pavement can also be lethal. We should do away with paved sidewalks.

The zionist game? That’s been the main playbook of all the Hamas supporters. “What do you mean we fired thousands of rockets aim at civilians before the IDF came in here? They’re just trying to oppress our rights to self expression”

The news outlets I saw reporting on this were mostly calling out that violence was started by agitators rather than counter-protestors

Nah, you have it backwards. The protestors broke into a building, so police was sent to get them out. It would be the same outcome as if you decided to break into a building and lock yourself in.

You got a source on that?

Bad timing on your end. The Colombia protestors just raided one of the halls and barricaded themselves in.

Tents on a lawn is one thing, even if they did nothing to silence the calls for hate among their ranks. Breaking (in the literal sense) into a building and causing damage is a whole level of escalation from the protestors. At what point do they shift into a violent riot?

W safety of some students cannot be comprised by granting other students their freedom.

That drives up maintenance significantly. You suddenly need your technicians driving around everywhere servicing small units rather than at one central location making sure the main unit is online.

Wrong, try again.

I’m talking about the deadline today. The university already started handing out suspensions for those still there, but haven’t cleared them out yet.

When the cops show up at your home are they your own funded private security? The university called them in due to trespassing protestors.

Go read up about what the first amendment actually is and how it applies to private entities (hint: it doesn’t).

Their camp is still there on campus past the deadline. They clearly haven’t fully faced the consequences of it yet.