![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
That’s fine as long as it can self reference.
That’s fine as long as it can self reference.
You need a phone, tablet, or other device that’s been rooted.
Damit
Reading the comments under it is funny, they biased the testing environment extremely so I don’t expect much of any big improvements from this.
There’s a significant detail which is missing from this analysis. The law which puts copyright over privacy is a French law, not an EU law. The EU court found that the French law doesn’t contradict any EU law.
So the EU court did not determine that copyright is more important than privacy. It determined only that the French parliament is allowed to decide that question for France.
So while this does set a bad precedence, it is not as bad as the title would like you to believe.
They do have a tab bar now, though it’s recent.
doesn’t support multi tab browsing
What do you mean? Having multiple tabs open at once?
10 minutes to widespread organ failure is a bit short for the players to figure anything out.
IANAL: The short of it is that unless Samsung can prove that it’s the software’s fault that the malfunction is there, they have to repair it. A blown efuse is just as much proof as the ‘warranty broken if removed’ stickers, which is none.
There’s lot’s of cases online where Samsung/resellers try to stop people but as long as you are persistent and don’t just accept them not wanting to fix it they will repair it.
There’s also some cases of going through the small claims court to handle this (which doesn’t cost anything if you win) Small claims court
Also: This ONLY applies to the normal EU warranty which you always have, any extended warranty does not need to repair your device if you’ve rooted it.
In the EU at least Samsung can’t make a fuss either.
How does a search engine being offline interrupt a device flashing?
Surely it can wait, right? How likely could it possibly be that it breaks when you least expect it?
It doesn’t though? IANAL but as far as I can tell you can fork, modify and redistribute it as long as you provide the source code to your users.
It’s AGPL-3.0 so… https://www.tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-affero-general-public-license-v3-agpl-3-0
For now
That’s not Firefox forcing you to update, you had Firefox open while you (/your package manager) was updating Firefox and after the update was done Firefox needs to be reopened. To prevent this you just have to …not update Firefox while it is running.
As long as you didn’t push
it’s fine.
Not yet ready for daily use!
We were on the verge of greatness, we were this close.
But those only have a short life, they don’t get many updates iirc.
Would this even cause a kernel panic? I think this just causes a userland “panic”