Remember when we just conversed like human beings and didn’t have all this convoluted nonsense about worrying over pronouns?

If the person is called John, 99.9% of the time, you know what the pronouns would be, because not everyone is terminally online.

I don’t do this, and growing up was taught that it was rude to refer to someone by anything other than their name in a group conversation.

Don’t use it then.

The only time you would ever need to use someone’s pronouns is when they’re not part of the conversation anyway.

I couldn’t care less what people refer to me as if I’m not there.

Amazon is the online equivalent of the middle aisle at Aldi.

If you’re introducing yourself to me, I only need your name.

I asked a similar question to this a couple of weeks ago due to me needing them for work, and I ended up going with the Loop Experience 2 and they’ve been fantastic.

They dampen the sound around me but I can still hear voices clearly, and they’re really comfortable and I barely notice I’ve got them in.

I’m 6’2. It’s a height that women seem to like, but I don’t need to duck to get through doors.

So yeah, it’s ideal.

But why set up a party about somewhere that’s not even in the UK and that the UK has no control over?

The fact these people won seats because Muslims care more about somewhere they’ve never even been to, rather than their home is bizarre.

What country are we in again?

The smile looks very similar…

I just got started working in a retro arcade.

It has a PS4 in it. 💀

There’s not really much doubt though, is there?

How is spreading lies about a company on a review platform a “protest”?

Surely if there was something to protest about, it would be about things that company had actually done, right?

Only the downvotes?

What about the cheering on of murder in the street?

People need money to live, Maeve.

It’s not just rich people who use a motorway.

Hopefully not another Libya, but I fear it will be another Libya.

They were two bonkers choices, but I don’t see what cancelling the election is going to achieve.

It’s going to give people the idea that it’s a stitch-up and make them mistrust elections in future. Why bother voting if they’re just going to cancel the result anyway?

How do I delete someone else’s post?

You’re advocating for a technocracy then, basically.

A system that sounds nice in theory (experts decide everything, surely that’s good, right?) but there would be decision makers with no accountability to the people they’re serving, lies and propaganda would potentially be more common and marginalised groups could end up even more marginalised, because the “experts” think it’s okay and there’s nothing you can do about it.

I don’t care if I’ll get hate for this but I don’t support universal voting, if you don’t know the most basic of facts, you should have no say in national decisions - end of the story.

Not having universal voting may be a bit extreme, but the sort of ignorance on display in the photo is precisely why I don’t support compulsory voting. A lower turnout with a more engaged electorate is preferable to people just putting an X next to something when they don’t really care or have very little information on what they’re doing.