Guys it’s OK I’m not a vampire, I 10x the garlic in every recipe I come across

So is it [bloːhaj]? I was trying to say [bloːhɑj] but [ɑ] feels perhaps odd next to the glide?

Completely an inference from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/Swedish so I may have fucked up the phonotactics

It’s been a long time since my Field Methods, class, but I remember that (Central Atlas) Tamazight had some interesting pragmatics because it seemed to have both a nominal and verbal forms for adjectives, including color. We got some cool sayings that pertained to associating color and action.

Alas, it was also a very BAD quality Field Methods class. Our prof couldn’t even figure out the region (because of poor elicitation choices) and it turns out the way the elicitation was being done, our consultant gave us SVO instead of the normal VSO 😭 (but still grammatically correct? But infelicitous). But you know, bad profs r a story for another time lol

I keep seeing people put random content on PH and go viral, and atp I think it’s time I start an abstract algebra course on OF (wait that’s just tuition…)

Praying the spirit of William Harrison occupies him today 😔

What is stable? I just run nix flake update then brew a coffee to accompany me for the next 12 hours

C for [ˌt͡ʃɛ.kʰɪ.sl̥oʊ̯.ˈvɑ.kʰi.ə] (Yes I did narrow transcription for the purpose of making it look worse 💀)

I think it’s kind of funny that they mention to allow the flat earth comments when just previously saying that they want to prevent cult-like behavior; flat-eathers won’t listen despite the evidence. Then again, verifiability doesn’t seem to be holding strong these days

I have quite literally dreamed about running neo/fastfetch 😭

I quite literally did this yesterday, but it’s OK, my roommates already did before me :)

You know, this ain’t so bad

I seriously thought I was reading Spanish at first

Not commenting on the validity of the post, but what is the area of a circle doing there? The only explanation I could see for calculus is if their profits were reported to them in an unclear manner (probably not…?) and then doing an optimization problem, but what kind of information must they be giving you to need calculus rather than using like dimensional analysis or something (or maybe it’s a tiered system like tax brackets)

I wonder if such a situation could occur if we were in some huge medium where Cherenkov radiation could occur

Hmmmm, I guess that the premise was probably wrong then, since the object necessarily has to have mass and travel slower than c (I mean, a massless object would be constrained the by c anyways). The gravitational lensing is a good addition! I have no idea how I forgot, but I remember a hs physics class where this came up for new telescope images

I always just used my left hand with the thumb and pinky as the y and x axes respectively, then the in-between fingers just help me visualize which “point” is higher (we only have two options to choose from if they’re not equal anyways)

Absolutely agree, lowk a programmer must’ve done it else I don’t think I’ve met a mathmematician (or maybe, not crazy enough ones) that ever preferred redefining variables (esp in pedagogical material!!!)

What do you want to learn PDEs for? It’s not my strong point, but I’ve heard high praise for Partial Differential Equations by Stanley J. Farlow. I found it useful in my undergrad, else I think I could have died in analytical mechanics

deleted by creator