Sure, but even if TikTok sold it wouldn’t solve the problem. Hell them not selling also doesn’t solve the problem.

The problem is that data is gobbled up and sold. Data/privacy protection laws to stop that would be useful.

Correct!

I’m not sure if there is a Stargate community, and if there were I wouldn’t be much help, haven’t seen it, yet.

Milking it? It’s a TV series. Most TV series have multiple seasons.

If it were a miniseries, that’s usually just the one season.

If it were a film, then a sequel is often a possibility.

So technically you’re right, but the law they passed left a HUGE loophole. And by loophole I mean just don’t be based on those counties and you can gobble up whatever data you like.

I don’t get it.

I don’t get it.

I… don’t get it.

Le correct.

You’re right, it’s unlikely a few miles will solve this problem.

An excellent guess, the city is in trouble but can’t be saved by moving it in this case.

I’m no lawyer but I don’t even think it’s that complex.

The law as written states “…However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.”

It goes on the clarify in a little more detail what a " qualified divestiture" is, but ultimately the determination seems to be by the President.

Trump can “make a deal” that he considers a “qualified divestiture” and allow the app again. For example ByteDance can sell TikTok to AmericaDance, a new company that just so happens to work for and does everything ByteDance does.

Now this wouldn’t hold up in any real court, but that would take A LONG time to resolve at which point Trump declares a win and likely everyone just moves on. Bonus during the 2028 election Vance or whomever can say that Democrats want to ban TikTok.

Why not good? Most Marvel movies are ~2 hours long, this is on the lower half but still about average.

Look at the little guy. He likes you.

Lisa, what are you trying to say?

Delicious? Correct, I also would have accepted Snacknacular.

Obvious from the trailers but excited to see Brainiac as the big bad. Plus with Superman and his secret lover Clark Kent out of the picture it’ll be up to Harley and Ivy to save the day.

Also I’ve never actually heard Metropolis be called “The Big Apricot” before. Has it come up anywhere outside the comics?

STELLA!

If no one cares enough to reopen it once every 6 months, then it’s probably fine to ignore it indefinitely.

It’s a matter of psychology. If I file a bug and it is ignored for years, I’m annoyed but eventually I either accept it, find a workaround or move on to something new. I may still file bugs in the future, especially if I’ve got a workaround, since other people probably want to know.

However if my bug is closed and I have to reopen it every six months. Now I’m kinda pissed. I have to be reminded every six months for years that this is just broken. I put in the effort, but now some bot has just come along and closed it. Plus it’s going to be harder to find an existing or similar bug. I’m less likely to look at closed bugs. But also, what if I find four similar closer bugs. Now if someone was tracking that bug they don’t realize this has happened to four different users. If we had just kept it in one big we’d all know. Also someone elses workaround is better than mine, or maybe it’s worse.

I understand if a project wants to declare bug bankruptcy. It shouldn’t happen often but if you do that’s the time to organize things.

Technically the other post was two seconds faster, but that’s close enough for double points!

Correct!

I think you could do a show with Billy, Agatha, Tommy & Vision tracking down Wanda. They could solve all the puzzles, take all the right steps only to discover her missing. We, the audience, could then see that Doom got there first. Of course that would require an existing Doom being a known threat.