Morphit

  • 15 Posts
  • 305 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Ah yes, the Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle. NASA’s plan was to put the Orion spacecraft on top of a Space Shuttle SRB. The projected development costs were $40 billion in 2009 and it was anticipated to cost about $1 billion per flight beyond that. Despite continued development, to this day, Orion still hasn’t flown a crew. An SRB was what killed the 7 crew aboard the Challenger.

    This was a pretty dumb idea, driven primarily by wanting to keep funding going to the same districts as in the Shuttle era. No one misses that system.

    Thinking that wasn’t capitalism is ridiculous - NASA designed the system and gave aerospace contractors (read - Boeing) a blank cheque to build it. The contractors of course used that money to lobby congress to spend even more money. Did you miss that part?


















  • Morphit toTechnology@lemmy.worldAssassination is a Leaky Abstraction
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I didn’t recognise the ‘10 seconds of human consideration’ claim. I found this ProPublica report on it: How Cigna Saves Millions by Having Its Doctors Reject Claims Without Reading Them

    There a former Cigna doctor says “It takes all of 10 seconds to do 50 at a time.” They claim to have seen documents for a two month period that put the average at 1.2 seconds per review. That’s using a specific review system that processed 300,000 claims over that period.

    They don’t mention if there were other claims processed with different methods but still, the OP article seemed to be generous with that claim.

    I don’t know what the “90%-error-rate AI” claim is about though. It’d be nice if the sources were actually cited.