Countries, especially Canada can and will freeze bank accounts as a back channel way to control people that they disagree with. Cash avoids this demonstrated risk and must be preserved as a primary payment method to preserve freedom

Yeah I’ll definitely keep that in mind as something to watch out for in what my cat eats. You know, once he finally gets done eating 1,000 mice and comes inside for some extra food…

Hateful AND fascist. Double whammy!

How fascist of you

Yeah, that’s exactly the point. They just indicate if you’ve paid for premium.

They learned it from all the blue states

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

The coercion is the same. Neither can consent or both can. It’s literally the same power dynamic

You’ve made nothing clear because you’re still confused and can’t understand how both are the same. Read back through and try to strengthen your understanding

Both were fair choices made in free will or neither were. Don’t be a hypocrite, you’re better than that

Removed by mod

Neither could the other employee. They were both forced. Use your brain

So was she. So no rape, right?

Lots of places had muzzle mandates, lots of places didn’t. No difference in spread

People were forced to get the shot

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

That’s a lot of words to dance around the fact that there’s the same power dynamic in both situations. Just admit it already