Great explaination!
If standards are being imposed, why not impose them to all people at the same level.
Thank you for taking the time to address this hypocrisy, where many do not see it or it seems that they just dismiss it and join the group think mob.
Edit2: I may have improved or just have worsen the phrasing and format; I am trying to make it more organized, but I have many points that I would like to share
I would be careful with that wording, it seems to be used to smear people that do not fall in line with status quo talking points.
They both could be seen as: conservatives, religious(higher than average, but it seems Tucker is a bit more consistant on his religious morals and outlooks), somewhat libertarian (Tucker, not too sure Vince), and other things I do not recall, currently.
I would be cautious of this label, having deep talks and multiple discussions with different people that are non status quo talking points may get anyone labeled as such, I see it as another smear tactic.
I see all legacy media and social media, as propaganda, everyone is trying to sway people to think a certain way, to a degree; some may have useful data/information, while others may have less, but it may push our own bias, which I see as a good thing.
As we grow, hopefully, we get better at questioning and being critical of what we see in the world(IRL and the internet), I am okay with continuing to watch and read from people like him and others.
We can always learn from people we do not think or agree with, even if it goes against the group think narratives or our own bias.
I do not like censorship or when others think we need babying, we can watch/listen/talk to whomever we like and make our own decisions on the matter.
I hope this may help you understand my view points a bit more, even if it may seem ‘out-there’.
Thank you for the comment!