The protocol isn’t the hard part. It’s the monetizing that is. Creators aren’t looking to provide content for free, especially if they are also now paying for hosting costs.
Ad spots (like Google does) work well because they can inject an up to date ad into an old video. In something like the fedeverse today a creators only option would be ads baked into the video, but they would only get paid for that up front which isn’t ideal…
I fail to follow how a competitor can pop up if the main users it’s attracting are ones that don’t want to view ads or pay for subscriptions.
Which is totally fair. There is so much misinformation flying around about this tax. The rich are flexing every muscle they have to try to make the general population dislike this change.
This change has no impact of the sale of a primary residence.
If they are selling a secondary residence and that sale is resulting in over 250k in profit than they are impacted, as they should be.
I had read that post already. Even if there are things that she’s doing that isn’t great, it doesn’t really justify a group of people circlejerking hate about them.
From the posts I’ve seen so far, it feels like the community is stating that they only exist to criticize what they see as a misleading influencer, but to me it all comes off as bullying/harrassment.
If they want to encourage change of some sort they could try and do that, but that’s not what the posts are encouraging, it feels like generic woman hate targeted at a single woman.
You keep suggesting opinions are fact… Anonymous posts aren’t facts regardless of how much you want to believe their contents.
Yes education does give people abase for learning how to fact check, but anyone (including you) can learn.
The post in this case isn’t even creded let alone creditable.
Things like the NYT and Washington Post are only creditable in the sense they link to their sources when they can, and when they can’t they can stand behind their reputation because they do share sources when they can.
But a single source isn’t enough to suggest that something is true. You as a reader need to be reading multiple sources and angles onbthebsake topic to get a healthy view on it, but those sources can’t be mostly opinion pieces (which is all you post).
An opinion piece in the NYT or Washington Post is just as useless as the majority of what you’re posting.
It’s frustrating because this government didn’t make up the name. This is a well understood system. By calling it by the typical name it should be easier for people to look into it understand it.
But so many people lack the ability to look into things and instead just listen to what politicians say.
But of course none of that matters these days. 😞
I certainly don’t think I can tell the difference in every case.
But the most basic validation (is this a creditable source, does it reference creditable sources) is really a good starting point.
This post doesn’t pass either of those.
There are more advanced techniques that can be used to fact check after that. But as a general rule (unless you really enjoy fact checking), if you’re not reading an official source and what you’re reading isn’t referencing an official source, it’s likely not worth giving any weight to.
Where there’s smoke, there’s a good chance there’s a fire!
The trouble is, it’s often just fog. And at somepoint you need to start recognizing the difference 😉
What on earth even is this. A whole lot of words, not a single source.
The site it is posted to is blogging site that anyone can post to.
Why would anyone try to pass this post off as official?
Sounds like a good incentive for them to implement the carbon capture they are so obsessed with.
I also hate every part of this and will turn it off as soon as it shows up.
But in terms of who actually wants this. If an AI assistant were to exist, and if it was actually going to be useful to someone, it would need to know just about everything in your life. At least in theory… In order for an assistant to be useful you would want to be able to ask it “what was Italian restaurant I was thinking of trying” and you would want a response.
I’m not sure this privacy nightmare of an implementation is the correct path to that, but that’s roughly what I suspect the desired outcome is.
There already aren’t gas stations in these remote locations. Why would there need to be EV chargers??
The thought of having rail service small campsites is comical.
If we did move to a world where cities are dense enough that public transit did replace cars for most people, cars would still be a viable rental for when leaving the city.
Removed by mod
It’s wild seeing you talk about dogma, then show how far down the rabbit hole you are. You talk about data, but never have anything to back it up. You ignore any data anyhow shares to you and retort with your own opinions. It’s so tiring.
Like I said originaly I only commented to help other people not fall down the same missinfomation spiral you have.
I hesitate asking you for a source on what Russias new revenue streams are.
GDP isn’t the same as revenue maybe that’s what you’re thinking?
Russian oil production is down since 2019.
It also feels like a stretch to assume you’re being downvoted for dogma related things when at this point that’s are multiple comments explaining how this post is misleading, this graph could be used as part of a larger argument, but as is it can’t be used as a conclusion.
Whoa there. You can’t be applying context to these images, it changes the message they were trying push.
Sponsors pay more upfront. If creators are only using sponsors than their whole back catalogue is basically valueless. If it costs a creator 2-10 cents a month to host a video (based off S3 pricing), but they only made 1000$ on it upfront when the video was made, overtime the back catalogue becomes a pretty significant financial burden if it’s not being monetized
Also it’s worth keeping in mind that many people are also using tools to autoskip sponsor spots, and the only leverage creators have for being paid by sponsors are viewership numbers.
Patreon is irrelevant, that’s just like Nebula, floatplane etc, it’s essentially a subscription based alternative to YouTube.
Discoverability is pointless if the people discovering you aren’t going to financial contribute. It’s the age old “why don’t you work for me for free, the exposure I provide will make it worth your time”, that hasn’t been true before and likely isn’t here. Creators aren’t looking to work for free (at least not the ones creating the high quality content we’re used to today)