• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle





  • I was using Gentoo for some years, and I have to say I do not regret switching to Arch.

    That said, power to those chosen or damned to wield Gentoo in the eternal war of kernels. They are the fabric of reality, interstellar light and darkness, they are the reason we, common folks, can live peacefully with precompiled packages, not knowing the pains of building everything from sources.





  • Never seen an intuitive UI. Been on Linux since 2004, was working on company-provided Macbook and struggled with UI, was very happy to abandon it. I have Windows as a gaming OS, dual boot configuration with my Arch Linux, and let me tell you I game on Windows like twice a month, absurdity of this OS makes me not want to game.

    For me the most intuitive UI is the one I built on Linux, with I3wm and a lot of custom scripts. This surely will not be intuitive for you.

    Universally intuitive UI is a myth.

    edit: UI designers, using right tools, definitely can and do make better UI, UI better suited for target audience, better working right out of the box. Keyword is “target audience”. One can’t say Windows UI is more intuitive, it’s UI a lot of people got used to. “Intuitive” has very different meaning AFAIK.



  • Good privacy brings inconvenience, don’t even think this compromise could ever be avoided. Convenient WhatsApp has nothing to do with privacy, whatever their PR department might want you to think.

    This compromise is unavoidable, and every user should be forced to make the choice. Every kind of defaults is bad. Can you imagine that a messenger app that forces you to choose your place on the scale of security-convenience during onboarding process gets wide adoption? Me neither…

    Telegram defaults are very sane for common users, and they have very easy and convinient way to start a secure chat. Best available messenger app so far.


  • WhatsApp by default backs up to Google drive, which is laughably insecure.

    I don’t know how good is WhatsApp’s e2e implementation, I’ve heard good things about protocol though. But I do know Telegram protocol documentation contains all information needed to implement e2e capable Telegram client, and their e2e is really good, I’ve seen it done by my friend and as I’m a programmer and am interested in cryptography, I followed his work very closely.

    I still do not trust e2e group chats, it’s a shaky point in security protocols. There was some kerfuffle about WhatsApp being able to silently add invisible listeners to group chats, wasn’t there?

    Telegram very explicitly chooses the right amount of security and makes user aware of inconveniences this level of security brings along. WhatsApp lies in user’s face, making you think it’s secure and convenient.

    edit: btw I’m Telegram premium subscriber and love it. I subscribed for the ability to convert voice messages into text. I am aware of privacy concerns, voice messages get sent to some 3rd party for this to work. Pretty often this speech-to-text works not very good, I expect it’s much better for English language though. I still love my Telegram premium, for being able to support developer and to lower the chance of being the product. Cost is negligible, benefits are tangible.

    Every service has a product they sell, if a service is free — you are the product.

    Need I remind you WhatsApp is owned by Meta? Free service from creators of Facebook and our mutual respect to their privacy practices, all in the same sentence, yeah.


  • Well, how do you define free will?

    I thought about it for quite some time and defined it for myself as following: free will is possibility to make two different choices in identical (down to quantum level and below) set of two universes. That applies only to something that has a “will”, which is yet to be defined.

    If being in identical circumstances you predictably make identical decisions, that doesn’t look like free will to me. Your choice was made by circumstances for you.

    So yeah, chaos it is. Nothing bad in it.





  • I am programmer by trade, been doing it for last like 20 years and I’ve worked with exactly 1 project manager that helped and 1 more that didn’t really matter. Every other project manager I worked with was bad for the managed project.

    I think that’s the case with CDPR: Cyberpunk 2077 was managed poorly. I’d they just didn’t release it on consoles, made it PC exclusive for a couple of years, the game would probably fare better.

    That said I as a PC person used to check game requirements and even if it looks ok I still do some research. Console players should do it too, it’s not a hard skill and doesn’t take much time, and if your are in a hype train this research would be enjoyable for you.


  • I played it on release, it was awesome. I didn’t ride the hype train, and this game was far more than i expected.

    I played it on laptop with Nvidia 2070 eGPU.

    I preordered it a year or so before the release because I enjoyed other games by CDPR, and never regretted it.

    I think i saw T-pose once. That didn’t prevent me to enjoy this game thoroughly, to be lost in Night City and to weep for Jackie and to be lost in thoughts after Sinnerman quest line.

    I never said some patch fixed it is going to fix the game, it is very good since release. DLC patch is going to change things, and I’m going to finish my 3rd playthrough this month and experience these changes in 4th playthrough.

    I do not tend to kill civilians in Cyberpunk, maybe that’s one reason I didn’t notice police AI problems. It’s not GTA. Maybe that’s just my play style that helped me to avoid all the problems you encountered.

    Even if that’s the reason, dude, I can’t stress enough how much I do not care for your opinion. This wall of text is for players that can enjoy good game, so they know Cyberpunk 2077 is one of the most enjoyable PC games one could play.