- 264 Posts
- 562 Comments
Pros
- Class-leading, bright 120Hz LTPO OLED panel.
- Excellent battery life.
- Very fast charging speed.
- Snappy and modern chipset, good sustained performance.
- On-board IR blaster.
Cons
- Unimpressive selfie and ultrawide cameras.
- Telephoto camera has only 2x optical zoom.
18·3 days agoThat would be a liability, and they would go after the parent company crying foul play.
Yeah, something like Adguard family DNS protection or any other family protection DNS service exist which works at the device level or even the network level and is simple to setup on smartphones and latops/computers or even the router.
YouTube won’t even load comments saying restricted mode if I browse through Adguard family protection DNS server.
6·4 days agoMy experience differs. I found optical in display fingerprint to be quite reliable. It even happens to work with slightly wet hands. The room being too dark or bright has also never been an issue since my finger covers the sensor completely.
I guess it depends on the quality of sensor used by the manufacter. Pixel phones are known to have issues.
That’s not how it will work.
Should it arrive to that they can still seize your devices and also force you to unlock your devices biometrics or patterns/passwords regardless. I wouldn’t trust law enforcements in this regard.
Yeah, lol. Who has the time to type a passcode or pattern unlock when a single click or glance can unlock your phone within a second.
Oppo has now announced global variants of both smartphones, but with radically different specifications. For starters, the cameras on the Reno12 Pro is radically different from the vanilla Reno12. Plus, both phones use a MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC instead of the Dimensity 8250 (Reno12) and Dimensity 9200+ (Reno12 Pro).
I don’t know what it is with global variants getting worse specs compared to Chinese versions. The other two dimensity SOCs would’ve made these smartphones much better. 7300 is midrange at best.
As mentioned earlier, the Oppo Reno12 Pro and Reno12 come with a MediaTek SoC. Oppo calls it the Dimensity 7300 Energy, which comes with the company’s Trinity Engine. It uses the ‘power of AI’ to dynamically allocate resources to apps.
Hmm…
Lastly, the Oppo Reno12 Pro and Reno12 come with a 5,000 mAh that supports 80 Watt SuperVOOC fast charging with a proprietary charger. USB-PD peripherals can charge the smartphone at up to 55 Watts.
At least USB-PD at high watts is supported.
Android is catering to the general public. The average user would easily understand fast, slow and normal. 20w, 68w, 5w not so much. But, I agree not having to use apps or 3rd party cables just to see the charging watts would be great. Even a Dev flag to enable the feature would be cool.
What ROM? Can’t be a pixel
Its purely a visual change to signal charging speeds to our eyes. There are no changes to power savings yet.
I have a realme smartphone with under display fingerprint sensor. I had last done setup in December for fingerprint and face unlock. It works fine without issues even now. Like the article mentioned it depends on the manufacturer and the hardware tuning. Pixels are known to have frequent issues to warrant this change.
Nintendo lawyers: Thinking if they should send a cease and desist to lineageOS devs in this case.
Interesting, after all the fuss about improved exynos and the success of the exynos 2400. Sounds counter intuitive but i guess exynos 2500 won’t be ready prime time even by samsung standards if they do not include it in their flagship S25 series smartphones.
I meant the sign in code google texts you. Not the App based One Time Password option. But, yes OTP option can also be set up as another fallback option
I guess you need to do a reinstallation. I do not experience this issue.
The profile pictures are super tiny and I only sometimes read the names. So, for the most part I only check the post/comment and decide on a vote or comment action.
You need your phone if it’s the 2nd authentication factor.
He won’t if he gets iprotection.