Mathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@programming.dev · 1 year agoReleased nvim-dap 0.7.0plus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square0fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10
arrow-up17arrow-down1message-squareReleased nvim-dap 0.7.0plus-squareMathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square0fedilink
Mathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@programming.dev · 1 year agonlua - neovim as lua interpreterplus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1message-squarenlua - neovim as lua interpreterplus-squareMathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareMathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.protoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Self hosted video chatlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago@YurkshireLad Depends on the video chat service and on the infrastructure of the participants. Most browser based video chat services use WebRTC which usually uses peer to peer if NAT hole punching works - but that depends on the ISP routers. This article explains it pretty well: https://blog.nirbheek.in/2023/07/webrtc-signalling.html?m=1 Services that may be easier to selfhost than Jitsi: https://github.com/miroslavpejic85/mirotalk https://galene.org/ linkfedilink
minus-squareMathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.proOPtoNeovim@open-source.social•Generating test boilerplate in [#neovim](https://social.fussenegger.pro/tags/neovim) for [#java](https://social.fussenegger.pro/tags/java)linkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago@neovim and another addition: Jumping to tests or related subjects linkfedilink
Mathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@open-source.social · 1 year agoGenerating test boilerplate in [#neovim](https://social.fussenegger.pro/tags/neovim) for [#java](https://social.fussenegger.pro/tags/java)plus-squaresocial.fussenegger.provideomessage-square1fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1videoGenerating test boilerplate in [#neovim](https://social.fussenegger.pro/tags/neovim) for [#java](https://social.fussenegger.pro/tags/java)plus-squaresocial.fussenegger.proMathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@open-source.social · 1 year agomessage-square1fedilink
Mathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@open-source.social · 1 year agoTagged & released 1.0.0 of nvim-fzyplus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square0fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down10
arrow-up15arrow-down1message-squareTagged & released 1.0.0 of nvim-fzyplus-squareMathias Fußenegger@social.fussenegger.pro to Neovim@open-source.social · 1 year agomessage-square0fedilink
@YurkshireLad Depends on the video chat service and on the infrastructure of the participants.
Most browser based video chat services use WebRTC which usually uses peer to peer if NAT hole punching works - but that depends on the ISP routers.
This article explains it pretty well: https://blog.nirbheek.in/2023/07/webrtc-signalling.html?m=1
Services that may be easier to selfhost than Jitsi:
https://github.com/miroslavpejic85/mirotalk
https://galene.org/