• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle

  • Just because it can be by the strict definitions of the English dictionary doesn’t mean that it means what you are claiming in context of Apple’s usages of the term.

    AirPort Extreme, note Apple’s intentional capitalisation of the word Port. Air is referring to wireless and Port is referring to Ethernet ports, AirPort is referring to how Wi-Fi is practically enabling wireless Ethernet ports. Extreme is just a typical tech industry descriptor meaning superiority. Even if you misread it as airport without the capitalization, a civilian thinks of vacations or visiting family or business trips when they think of airports, not military power projection abroad. There’s a reason they’re called air bases instead of airports.

    Along the same lines, AirPower is obviously talking about wireless energy. Air- as a prefix is used by Apple to mean wireless with not just AirPorts, but AirPlay, AirPods, AirTag, etc. Power is obviously talking about energy because it’s literally a wireless charging pad.

    You’re just reading your personal bias into these names that Apple themselves never intended, and your reading is only enabled by the English language having these words possess various meanings in different contexts.


  • We are not talking fatalities, we are talking casualties. You cannot convince me that an explosive decompression at 16k feet won’t cause serious injury at the least.

    Edit: seat belts are designed against the forces of severe turbulence, not explosive decompressions. Assuming the seat belt actually holds, all the forces are applied against the single point of contact the belt has with the midsection of the passenger. Reminder that the forces were enough to torque two seats, rip the padding off the closest seat, and ripped the shirt off a nearby passenger. I actually think there is a decent chance there would’ve been a fatality should anybody have sat in the closest seat.



  • Ramune@lemmy.worldtoMahjong@lemmy.nerdcore.socialHow is this 1shanten?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I personally wouldn’t prioritize saving the head over completing a 3 block because I’ve won plenty of games where I was tenpai waiting for the head and I’m able to adjust what I’m waiting on to something others are more likely to discard. Of course I wouldn’t intentionally aim for tenpai waiting for the head but if it plays out like that at least I can mess with people by waiting on a tile in a riichied player’s discard.

    Edit: JPML’s play like a pro episode 3 explicitly teaches against committing to a head instead of just completing the block. Episode 5 further expands the idea by not even having a pair at tenpai in their second example.


  • Ramune@lemmy.worldtoMahjong@lemmy.nerdcore.socialHow is this 1shanten?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Idk I also just applied 5 block method but came to a different conclusion than you. 333pin, 5668pin (expecting 2), 234sou, 4668sou (expecting 2). I gave the solution that reduces 5668pin group to one block because that’s what the game is suggesting, but you can do the same with the sous instead by discarding 8sou now, draw 7pin and discard 4sou, now tenpai waiting on 4/7pin

    I don’t see why you split 234sou because that’s literally already complete, I wouldn’t even consider using 4sou as the head unless I draw another 4sou or I draw 1sou, even then I’d discard 1sou to preserve tanyao especially when there are other head candidates in the hand already