If you pin and unpin, it should federate the changes.

How does it differ from Codeberg and Forgejo?

What radicle?

I believe a couple Android clients have multi support. Voyager IIRC.

That’s a stellar post. Shout-out to you!

Bitte!

!germany@feddit.org

Last I checked, the issue is down to different people wanting different things. Some people want instance.tld/multi/community1@instance1.tld1;community2@instance2.tld2;community3@instance3.tld3, others want instance.tld/multi/hash but some people want instance.tld/greedy/topic of which, there’s no easy way to do and definitely won’t happen, but because they’re so vocal, it’s just stalled the whole implementation.

But I think that if multi community view is implemented and we can opt communities out of all, it might increase quality, which could be interesting.

Nope, you can find the feature request here https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/818

I’m pretty sure the answer is yes

Summary

According to the video, open source software is not necessarily as important for servers and IT in the modern world as it was in the past. This is because software updates are now delivered electronically over the internet, making it less important to have access to the source code. Additionally, companies typically pay for service agreements with software vendors, which means that the vendor will fix bugs and update the software for them. Even if a company has access to the source code, they may not have the expertise to fix the software themselves.

I believe this is a perfect example of what I believe is called the Dunning-Kruger effect. In the same way that I’m glad amateurs are given a platform, I rue the fact that amateurs are given a platform as a little bit of research would’ve prevented them making themselves look so stupid. “Servers don’t need open source” with 97% of the top 100 servers running Linux looks like an odd position to take. Maybe they’re trolling.

Yay, I’m glad.

Aha. I see so many Docker projects with examples of how to build for ARM, I just assumed it was always that easy.

What I mean is, given the open source nature of RISC V, if someone puts out a chip with a proprietary extension, isn’t it likely that there will be a rip off that does the same but in an alternative manner? Like how there’s tonnes of Raspberry Pi like boards available.

Couldn’t we do that with x86?

Can the extensions not be replaced?

It’s not even the first time 😭

ARM will replace x86 and RISC V will move into ARM’s old slot.

That’s hilarious

It is the future, but not the way everyone thinks. Everyone thinks drones will be for the last mile, but the reality is they’ll be for the last five metres. Amazon will have a vehicle that can drive down your road and the drone will take your package, fly out and return to the van. Each van will have a minimum of six drones and the only time the driver has to stop is when all drones are out of the vehicle. I imagine that consumers will be able to set preferences, like leave at this particular spot or only attendance required, for which it would ring the bell/phone/app of the person.

Once they sort out autonomous driving, then humans will vanish from the delivery process all together.