People bitch about it because of it’s wide usage in a system. But distros like systems because it has a wide usage within a system.
Really? There is a law already for this?
I think we need a very strict regulation, where the wording is never “purchase” or “buy” or “own”. It should always be “rent”. Because that’s what it is.
Youre right damn
Data information == metadata?
(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.
imo this also includes “the data must be open”. The data used for training must be obtainable.
Not caring about what Russia wants? Why not, its a big country with big influence?
The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?
Context please, and how will they pay the fine?
Software engineer here, that’s like some of the modern open source library that’s used by everyone.
not even going to verify how accurate this is. Thanks
Explain it this to me in a green text format “be me”
Could’ve put the app into maintenance mode instead of archiving it.
How about a license which will also make the collective work into the same license as the work itself? Coverage as in it could reach more in terms of copyleft-ness.
Ah yes, the little old interrupt
If it ain’t madhouse, then its probably going to be a skip for me.
I can imagine this to tank my PC performance, especially on large projects lol