he’s no brian leiter.
priorities, but you know how OnlyFans creators be posting to own the discourses https://archive.ph/337Kw #nowplaying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdGbXISimlk
he’s no brian leiter.
one cat’s nip is another cat’s jazz
but it allows for some people to type out one-liners and generate massive blobs of text at the same time that they could be doing their jobs. /codecraft
elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance
seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn’t, as what a settlement might imply.
is the threat better than the existence of the threat? does threatening mean being constantly present?
have books become too heavy for men?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
doctrine of double effect hours
since 2008 (the artilect wars) or the third “a.i.” winter?
the gettier problem
mmo festive “sexual” cartesian theatres coming for disney world from japan with loving kindness
South Park’s comedic antics will be lost on droves of beautiful souls unless The Critic is rebooted.
algorithms of oppression. noble.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
since you know by 2020 that modeling categorical logic and categorical truth tables tell you less about the “trumper” than the non-trumper do you [really] want to risk it, framing the trumper, at least, as a “moron” who can’t muster the “IQ” points (btw, was everybody jumping on that that new EQ+AQ+SQ wagon to own the Young-Girl’s war on war)?
that paradoxical circumstance where trump acts the fool, because he knows you’ll take the bait, in front of his base, amplified by algorithmic blunders: socialism and barbarism/annihilation, have always lived side-by-side. your mythology of technology only cyclically prevents you from seeing that.