majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoHow dare you use a text editor because it's easy to uselemmy.fosshost.comimagemessage-square329fedilinkarrow-up1858arrow-down160
arrow-up1798arrow-down1imageHow dare you use a text editor because it's easy to uselemmy.fosshost.commajestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square329fedilink
minus-squaretheshatterstone54linkfedilinkarrow-up15·4 months agoThat’s like the picture of a normal dude with Nano, a large Vim dude, a larger buff Emacs dude and an ever larger massive Ed dude.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·4 months agoeh the emacs folks are just chilling in a corner somewhere. Maybe in the old folks home together with the ed users
minus-squareescapedgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoDon’t forget the joe user in the corner wearing a trench coat with a bomb strapped to his chest wired to a dead man’s switch.
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoDo people still use ed unironically outside of scripting context?
minus-squarepeto (he/him)@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoUnironically? Maybe not. But using something ironically is still using it.
That’s like the picture of a normal dude with Nano, a large Vim dude, a larger buff Emacs dude and an ever larger massive Ed dude.
eh the emacs folks are just chilling in a corner somewhere. Maybe in the old folks home together with the ed users
Don’t forget the joe user in the corner wearing a trench coat with a bomb strapped to his chest wired to a dead man’s switch.
Ed is like Skynet itself.
Do people still use ed unironically outside of scripting context?
Unironically? Maybe not. But using something ironically is still using it.