• Blackmist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That’s under load. At Idle (which is where your average home PC will spend most of it’s time) I think Intel has the edge still.

    It’s certainly a consideration for a battery device. Watching a video reading emails or staring at a spreadsheet will likely have better battery life than a similar spec AMD device.

    We’ve reached a point where most everyday computing tasks can be handled by a cheapo N100 mini PC.

    • daellat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I would have to ask for a source on that. I can’t really find anything comparing many cpus.

      However this video compares top end models on otherwise pretty much identical laptops and amd definitely wins in YouTube playback on battery https://youtu.be/X_I8kPlHJ3M?si=8a4Tkmd556hQh7BZ

      But if you’ve got anything to better compare I’m all ears

      • Blackmist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        It may well be the case that they’re similar or even swapped now. I can see that the N100 is pretty low power compared to the newest low end AMD chips, but then the AMD chips are better in terms of what they can do.

        This one reckons they’re pretty similar.

        https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/10evt0z/ryzen_vs_intels_idle_power_consumption_whole/

        This one reckons Intel are better.

        https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32809852

        I doubt there’s much in it either way. Even if AMD are ahead now, laptops don’t get replaced right away, normies replace shit when it fails or is too slow to run whatever shit Google shoehorned into Chrome this year, and the most popular laptops are probably the ones with the lowest sticker price.