• Mr_Blott
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well at least you’re good at… losing wars, I dunno

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The winning or losing was almost always secondary. The main thing is to spend a load of money on wars. We’ve never failed at that.

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Military skill was a use it or lose it thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if all of the wars that the US has been fighting have been intentional, specifically in order to maintain skilled soldiers.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Government spending in the Military Industrial Complex is the point.

          An able militia military is a side effect.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Destabilizing other countries and exploitation of natural resources and cheap labor, in order to maintain USD and military hegemony. That’s why.