• @HumanPenguin
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Giving a nation the idea you may support an enemy. Is in no way a protection from that nation taking control of your assets. It is at best giving the nation the ability to rationalise the need to limit your own power.

    After all dispite not seeing any reason why any corp in the US would be worried about current potential govs nationalising them. It just not something either of the main parties are fans of.

    Its even less likely musk would see cooperation with russia as a way to prevent such a thing.

    • @neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      I mean siding with Trump, buying Twitter and the “free speech” people. This is the smoke screen so that he CAN defend Russia and make Biden wary of fighting back, because he now has the unconditional support of 30% of the country.

      Not that aiding Russia is the prevention, I think it may be at least part of the goal.

      • @HumanPenguin
        link
        English
        29 months ago

        While I hate to give the little shit the benifit of the doubt.

        It is worth considering. That there are plenty of other people out their. Who truly think letting russia keep the ground they have taken. Is the best way to prevent the war continuing on.

        I disagree because evidence is give russia an inch. And they will just wait until they build up again. And take your whole nation. They are just not trustworthy when it comes to peace treaties.

        But plenty of folks are less untrusted (more stupid imho)

        There is also more direct fiscal reason why he may want to discurage the US from supporting Ukraine.

        If the war continues with the current US weapons spending on Ukraine support. Eventually the gov is going to have to raise money to do so. This drematically increases the risk that industries like his. Will lose some tax breaks or loopholes he uses.