• jabjoe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It just means more has to be spent to do so. It’s to sabotage the costs of going back on their decision.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be pretty unpopular and therefore unlikely, but there’s technically nothing stopping a law being created specifically to buy the land back at the price it’s being sold for.

      Hell, since we’re not in the EU any more, we don’t have the laws preventing the government from just taking it for free, but that would be politically suicidal.

      • jabjoe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still makes it harder than keeping the land. They could have finished the first leg, then completely replanned/redesigned the second, using the same path.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh don’t get me wrong, I agree they shouldn’t be selling it.

          But it’s clearly the Tories being fucking children and trying to make it difficult for a successive government to do the job they were unable to do themselves.

          It’s actively malicious