The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agoChicago Man is ungovernablelemmy.worldimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1986arrow-down125
arrow-up1961arrow-down1imageChicago Man is ungovernablelemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squaretegs_terrylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down5·8 months agoNo journal would write ‘off of’ in a headline
minus-squaredejected_warp_core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·8 months agoIt’s bad grammar. “from” says the same thing in fewer words, which is generally how news headlines are structured. A tighter headline would be: Chicago man used grabber toy to steal police firearms, arrested
minus-squareSabre363@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoBut that headline is far less amusing to read
minus-squaretegs_terrylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoWrong preposition and ‘of’ doesn’t follow ‘off’.
minus-squaretegs_terrylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoNah, and certainly not for a news headline
minus-squareplatypus_plumba@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoAnd even worse “Off of Officers”. That just sounds ridiculous.
No journal would write ‘off of’ in a headline
Why not?
It’s bad grammar. “from” says the same thing in fewer words, which is generally how news headlines are structured.
A tighter headline would be:
But that headline is far less amusing to read
Never seen a British tabloid?
Wrong preposition and ‘of’ doesn’t follow ‘off’.
Nah it makes sense
Nah, and certainly not for a news headline
And even worse “Off of Officers”. That just sounds ridiculous.