• Aggravationstation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is that whole sobriety test thing real in the US? Like, stand on one leg and recite the alphabet etc? I’ve seen it on TV but always thought it was pretty stupid. In the UK the police have breath-tested for drink driving since 1967.

    • realbadat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Depends. Smaller townships without regular access to a breathalyzer, yes. Or cops trying to get you to admit that you are intoxicated.

      I walked a straight line while touching my nose because the cop smelled alcohol in the car (rightly so, my wife, then gf, was smashed). Took about 10 seconds for him to go “So obviously that’s all her, have a good night!”.

      So yes, it does happen.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh they do both. And you can get what they call a DWI (Driving While Impaired) just on the basis of the circus act in some states. So the breath test comes back at say, .037, which is well within the legal limit. The cop can charge you with DWI anyways based on your bad balance.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Forget the bad balance. All the cop has to put in his report is the language they were taught. The suspect had red, glassy eyes when I approached. They might as well drag and drop these statements or just have them written by LLM.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s real, and it’s totally based on the officer’s gut feelings. Hell breathalyzers over analyze over 70% of the time. The entirety of the war on drugs and the tools to combat drunk driving are not entirely based in science

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        tools to combat drunk driving are not entirely based in science

        To the point that the accuracy of breathalyzers has been challenged so many times in CA that it’s to the point that if the cops in CA have you breathe into a machine and that machine returns a number that would constitute a DUI if that were your BAC then it’s a DUI, regardless of what the machine actually does or whether the number in question is actually connected to your real BAC in any way.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s all really just an excuse by the popo to book you. Which is why you should always ask for the breathalyzer if you really weren’t drinking.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      it’s real, and it does work pretty well.

      We also do the breathalyzer, or blood draws, but those are a little more involved, and if you can’t do a field sobriety test then you definitely as hell can’t drive a fucking car lmao.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          you think those people are required to do them? One of the primary tests doesn’t even require you to move. 50% of the other two are literally counting.

          And like i said, you can just hit them with the blow test? Or blood like i mentioned, that’s a particularly good one.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            In some states refusing the circus act is an automatic DUI. Even if you ask for a blood test. We have the technology to just do away with it. And dyslexic people can drive just fine while fucking up the numbers and alphabet. It just needs to go.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              that is pretty silly, though idk much about the specifics of it, really it should only mean you get arrested/detained, it shouldn’t be possible to charge you with something that isnt proven.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                It shouldn’t. And yet it is. That’s not even the worst use of that though. Cops can beat you up and arrest you for resisting arrest at any time. And that generally comes with jail time.

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  well i mean resisting arrest is quite literally illegal, so that would make sense, considering that if you’re evading arrest, you probably have a reason to be doing so.

                  Though you also have to resist arrest for that one to happen. Otherwise it’s unlawful use of force.