I know the real answer is reddit but I really don’t want to go back now that I’ve already grown used to life without it. I was hoping for Lemmy to be a viable substitute but it isn’t. I can see how this place is wonderful for the certain type of person but that person is not me. My experience during the past 6+ months has been a net negative and I’m pretty much ready to move on. I just don’t know where else to go.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Commune-ism sounds like a lovely idea on a small scale, you gotta solve a lot of political problems to make it work on anything bigger. Social democracies like the scandinavians seem to be the best way we currently know to run a humanitarian society.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Are they though? I just feel like we aren’t solving the issues we ought to.

        First, nobody gets hungry ever again.

        Then, everybody gets roof over their head.

        After that, we can start discussing the next steps.

        And yes, we need to do this globally, with nobody left behind.

        • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s neither exclusive to communism nor has it been achieved in most purportedly communist states (I hear Vietnam’s actually been having a good run of things but I can’t speak to specifics).

          Socialism != communism.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s definitely not happening now under any social democracy.

            Socialism is supposed to be a transformative period, leading to communism. I have no idea why people write the !=.

            • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Because exclusively that’s the communist viewpoint. There are different socialist ideologies than communism. It’s a rectangle vs square situation.

                • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  “Socialism will transition to communism” is just a communism thing. Social democracy is different. It doesn’t involve communism. Because communism is cringe.

                  • msage@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Communism isn’t cringe, wtf are you talking about. And yes, if we want to discuss communism, we need to take into account that it was suggested to start with socialism beforehand.

                    Social democracy has jack all to do with socialism, if we want to keep being pedantic. And social democracy does not fare all that well in poorer countries, even after massive EU funds. Which is the real cringe.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That is not an unthinkable scenario. The universe is so vast yet there is no sign of life anywhere else. Why? Perhaps intelligent life simply isn’t intelligent enough and they always end up destroying themselves. A so called “great filter”. Is it behind us or ahead? Who knows.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Given the state of our climate, I would say it’s very closely ahead of us, and we are not going to make it. Which is a shame, we are so close.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Right now I don’t see how our current society can survive. We are doing nothing at all to stop burning fossil fuels (renewables go up, but so does fossil burning), the richest find more and more absurd ways to waste energy (bitcoin, LLMs), everywhere more and more people go poor even in developed nations (prices skyrocketing, mainly food and rent), and we are just starting to see that climate is starting to change, and not to our optimistic scenarios.

                I don’t think we are going to make it.

                • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  For me it’s more about the political climate. I don’t see the actual climate change as an existential threat to the human race in a way something like nuclear war, a pandemic, asteroid or AI could be. It’s bad but it’s not that bad. I never really understood why so many seem to think this way when I don’t even hear scientists making such apocalyptic claims.

                  • msage@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Maybe I understood the situation too bleakly, but my impression was, that we are losing topsoil (used to grow almost all our food), biodiversity is plummeting (which can trigger chain reaction of massive die-offs), the ice is melting (blue ocean event, likely irreversible) causing billions of people to lose their homes, and depleting aquifies (drinking water). Hotter climate will cause runaway effects, that will multiply all of this, which could lead to decimating most of life in the oceans (food for majority of people), meaning more hungry people inland, politically already unstable, now without soil, water, and getting severe droughts and much more acidic rain. There are possibilities of new diseases appearing from the thawing permafrost, as well as newly mutated ones.

                    Everything will be made worse by the current trends in politics, but I suspect those politics are trending because some people are aware where are we heading.

                  • Dasus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I don’t see the actual climate change as an existential threat to the human race in a way something like nuclear war, a pandemic, asteroid or AI could be. It’s bad but it’s not that bad.

                    “My ignorance is worth more than your knowledge.”

                    https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/03/20/climate-change-ipcc-report-15/

                    Beyond that threshold, scientists have found, climate disasters will become so extreme that people will not be able to adapt. Basic components of the Earth system will be fundamentally, irrevocably altered.

                    The report reveals thresholds in how much warming people and ecosystems can adapt to. Some are “soft” limits — determined by shortcomings in political and social systems. For example, a low-income community that can’t afford to build flood controls faces soft limits to dealing with sea level rise.

                    But beyond 1.5 degrees of warming, the IPCC says, humanity will run up against “hard limits” to adaptation. Temperatures will get too high to grow many staple crops. Droughts will become so severe that even the strongest water conservation measures can’t compensate. In a world that has warmed roughly 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) — where humanity appears to be headed — the harsh physical realities of climate change will be deadly for countless plants, animals and people

                    “I’ve never understood why…”

                    And I can bet you never tried to understand.