• Ethalis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    You should always start your argument with an ad hominem and, if it doesn’t work, slowly work your way towards insulting your interlocutor, the highest form of rethoric

      • mathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        No no, that’s name calling already, you jumped straight to the top. You need to cloak your disdain in a civil tone, because remember the next step is going to tone policing. So something like, “I don’t think you have a lot of experience arguing on the internet seeing as you come from a much smaller instance.” is much better bait.

            • BountifulEggnog [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I thought it was a joke about starting an argument with an ad hominem.

              :smuglord: actually, I think you’ll find that I did attack him personally instead of his underlying points, which according to rationalwiki, counts.

              spoiler

              It was/is but your bit was better. Admitting being wrong isn’t a step though. That’s also why I deleted it until you responded because I realized I’m not funny 😢